Search Results for "delayed delivery"

471 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 471 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petitions Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Arbitrator's Awards in Charterparty Dispute. Court Confirms That Arbitrator's Findings on Breach of Contract and Damages Are Not Open to Reappraisal Under Section 34.

The Petitioner, Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. (RCF), a public sector company, entered into an Agreement of Affreightment with the Respondent,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows GMADA's Appeal in Consumer Case; Sets Aside Additional Loan Interest Award. Refund of Flat Purchase Amount with 8% Compound Interest Upheld as per Letter of Intent, but Directing Developer to Pay Interest on Home Loan Not Justified.

The dispute arose from a residential scheme launched by Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA) for 'Purab Premium Apartments' in Sector 88,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Whether Lift Installation Contracts Are 'Works Contract' or 'Sale of Goods' for Sales Tax Purposes. The Matter Was Referred to a Larger Bench to Resolve Conflict Between Prior Rulings and to Determine the Applicability of the Predominant Intention Test After Recent Judgments.

The matter stems from multiple writ petitions and civil appeals challenging the classification of contracts for manufacture, supply and installation o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appeal under Section 91 of Trade Marks Act, 1999 against Registrar's order permitting delayed evidence affidavit

The Bombay High Court heard an appeal under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 against an order of the Registrar of Trade Marks allowing a delaye...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Grounds for Interference Established. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings Were Based on Evidence and Not Perverse, and the Petition Was Barred by Limitation.

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to set aside an arbitral ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurer's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Marine Insurance Claim. The Court upheld the arbitrator's finding that goods destroyed by fire at a CFS warehouse were covered under the FOB clause of the Marine Cargo Open Policy.

The case involves a challenge by Tata AIG General Insurance Company Limited (the petitioner/insurer) to an arbitral award passed in favor of M/s. Manh...