Search Results for "block period"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "block period"

2968 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2968 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Employee in Pay Fixation Dispute — No Misrepresentation by Employee. Recovery of Rs.3,46,931/- from pension set aside as order passed without notice and employee not responsible for pay fixation error.

4 Aug 2021

The petitioner, Rangrao s/o Mersing Jadhav, was appointed as a Peon on 08.11.1983 and superannuated on 31.08.2017 as Junior Administrative Officer (Su...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment in Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. The Petitions, Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, Sought to Quash Preliminary Notification Dated 21.05.2008 Under Section 17(1) and (3) of BDA Act and Final Notification Dated 18.02.2010 Under Section 19(1).

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

KAHC010217682014_1

12 Jun 2015

...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Examines Challenge to Rejection of Mercy Petition in Death Penalty Case Arising from Conviction Under Struck-Down Section 303 IPC. The petitioner raised multiple supervening circumstances including inordinate delay, solitary confinement, and non-application of mind by the authorities.

17 Aug 2023

The writ petitioner, a 70-year-old death row convict, challenged the rejection of his mercy petition by the President of India dated 04.01.2013, seeki...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Petition by Union of India for Mandatory Army NOC near Colaba Military Station — Security Concerns Over Adarsh Building Construction. The petition sought demolition of the Adarsh Cooperative Housing Society building for lack of security clearance from the Defence Department as required for constructions near military installations.

29 Apr 2016

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed by the Union of India through the Indian Army seeking a mandamus to restrain the St...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Regular First Appeal Under Section 96 CPC Against Order Rejecting Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in Suit for Partition and Declaration. Trial Court Found No Cause of Action and Allowed Application Filed by Defendants 24 and 26; Appeal Examines Whether Plaint Discloses Triable Issues.

29 Jun 2026

The present Regular First Appeal was filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the plaintiffs against the order dated 14.10.2019...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Non-Application of Mind. Notice Issued Based on Search Materials Without Independent Satisfaction or Opportunity of Hearing Held Invalid.

9 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Dilipbhai Prabhudas Patel, an individual and part of the PSY Group engaged in real estate business, filed his return of income for Ass...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Appeals Filed Against Single Judge Order in Land Acquisition Matters Involving KIADB. Appeals Challenge Order Dated 04.07.2025 in Various Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners and Developers.

29 Jul 2026

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposed of Batch Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for BDA Layout at Bangalore. Petitioners Sought Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout.

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

7 Oct 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)