Search Results for "Rule 330"

376 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 376 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Possession Suit, Restores Concurrent Findings of Trial and First Appellate Court. High Court's Reversal Set Aside for Reappreciating Evidence Beyond Second Appeal Scope Under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves a dispute over possession of agricultural land. The plaintiff, Rajendra Kumar Gupta, filed a suit for recovery of possession based o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Recovery. Identification of accused not established beyond reasonable doubt as test identification parade was not conducted and recovery of stolen articles was not proved.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, dated 4th August 1998, in Sessions Case No.33...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pensioner's Writ Petition for Fixation of Pay Scale and Pensionary Benefits in Education Service — Held that Petitioner is Entitled to Pay Scale of Trained Graduate Teacher and Pensionary Benefits from Date of Initial Appointment.

The petitioner, Walmik Sitaram Sirsath, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in the Government D.Ed. College, Neknoor, on 1.12.1984. He possessed a B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses KSFC's Petition for Impleadment in Specific Performance Suit — Mortgagee Not a Necessary Party Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Section 31E of SFC Act, 1951 Does Not Confer Right to Sue for Specific Performance of Third-Party Contracts.

The Karnataka State Financial Corporation (KSFC) filed writ petitions challenging the order of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Mangalore, dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Director in Dishonour of Cheque Cases Due to Lack of Specific Averments — Petitioner Not a Director of the Drawer Company at Relevant Time

The petitioner, Sri Shamanur Shivashankarappa, filed three criminal petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Excess Salary Paid to Employee Due to Mistaken Fixation of Pay Scale. Petitioner failed to challenge the recovery order within reasonable time and the recovery was based on a mistake of law.

The petitioner, Smt. E.S.S. Almeida, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging an order dated 24-09-2003 passed by the res...