Search Results for "Retiral benefits"

506 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 506 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Interest on Delayed Retiral Benefits to Exonerated Employee — Rule 55A(7) of Pension Rules, 1953 Deems Payment Due from Retirement Date, Not Exoneration Date, and Interest Is Payable Without Proving Administrative Lapse.

The petitioner, Narayan Pundalik Pathade, a retired employee of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), filed a writ petition under Articl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Labour Court's Award of Gratuity and Leave Encashment. Recovery of Amount from Retired Employee's Retiral Benefits Without Opportunity of Hearing Held Unjustified.

The petitioner, Tularam s/o Adkuji Bhogare, was employed as a Grader with the Maharashtra State Co-operative Tribal Development Corporation Limited (M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Recovery Orders for Excess Salary Paid to Retired Government Employee — Employee Not at Fault for Wrong Pay Fixation. Recovery of excess salary impermissible when promotional orders stand, following precedent in Gajanan Prabhakarrao Pande v. Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran.

The dispute arose from a service matter involving a retired employee of Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran who challenged recovery of alleged excess salar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Petition for Family Pension Despite Pending Caste Validity Claim. Death of Employee Does Not Abate Caste Scrutiny Proceedings; Committee Must Decide on Merits for Entitlement of Retiral Benefits.

The petitioner, Sunita Thakar, is the widow of Pradip Thakar, who was employed as a Chaukidar (a post reserved for Scheduled Tribe) with the Governmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Teacher in Voluntary Retirement Dispute. Acceptance of Voluntary Retirement Without Allowing Withdrawal Within Notice Period Under Section 7(2) of MEPS Act, 1977 Held Illegal.

The petitioner, Shri Guru Buddhiswami Mahavidyalaya, through its Secretary and Principal, challenged the judgment and order dated 06/12/2013 of the Sc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Former OCS Employees Seeking Government Pension After Absorption in VSNL. Eligibility for Pension Under Office Memorandum Requires Minimum 10 Years of Qualifying Service on Date of Absorption.

The present Civil Appeal arose out of a challenge to the Judgment and Order dated January 13, 2016 passed by the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Teacher in Voluntary Retirement Case. Acceptance of Voluntary Retirement Without Statutory Notice Period Under Section 5(3) of MEPS Act, 1977 Held Illegal.

The petitioner, Shri Guru Buddhiswami Mahavidyalaya (the Management), challenged the judgment and order dated 06/12/2013 of the School Tribunal, Latur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Reduction of Pension for Bank Employee Under Central Bank of India (Employees’) Pension Regulations, 1995. Prior Consultation with Board of Directors Mandatory Before Reducing Pension Below Full Admissible Amount Under Regulation 33.

The dispute arose from the compulsory retirement of an employee of the Central Bank of India, who had served as Chief Manager, a scale IV officer. Dur...