Search Results for "Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Act"

841 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 841 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CIDCO's Tender Cancellation as Arbitrary and Unreasonable. Petitioner's Highest Bid Accepted After 21 Months, Cancellation Without Justification Violates Article 14.

The petitioner, Bhagwati Akshar Empire LLP, participated in an e-auction conducted by the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Permanent Status for Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation Workmen. TNMSC Employees Secured Their Rights Under the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments Act, 1981, After a Protracted Legal Battle

The Court has addressed cross appeals involving the Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation Limited (TNMSC) and its employees' union regarding the app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Promotion to Law Officer Post in Municipal Corporation — Petitioner Not Entitled to Promotion as Appointment Was by Direct Recruitment and Petitioner Did Not Meet Eligibility Criteria.

The petitioner, Sanghmitra R. Sandansing, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai to promote her to t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Property Tax Levy by Panvel Municipal Corporation on Kharghar Node. Petitioners Lacked Locus Standi and Failed to Exhaust Statutory Remedy of Appeal Under Section 406 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

The petitioners, Kharghar Co-op. Housing Societies Federation and an individual resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Court Remand Order in MRTU & PULP Act Case — Maintainability of Complaint Must Be Decided on Merits Without Remand. Relationship of Employer-Employee Must Be Admitted or Undisputed for Complaint Under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act to Be Maintainable.

The petitioners, employees of the Forest Department, filed Complaint (ULP) 13/2010 before the Labour Court, Yavatmal, alleging unfair labour practices...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...