Bombay High Court Allows Widows' Petitions for Compassionate Appointment Despite Delay in Application. Municipal Corporation Directed to Consider Applications on Merits Under Section 79 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 and Rule 3 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations (Appointment on Compassionate Grounds) Rules, 1995.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 76
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment pertains to a group of writ petitions filed by widows of deceased employees of the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation seeking compassionate appointment. The petitioners' husbands died while in service, and the petitioners applied for appointment on compassionate grounds after a delay ranging from 5 to 10 years. The respondent corporation rejected their applications solely on the ground of delay. The court examined the purpose of compassionate appointment, which is to provide immediate relief to the family of the deceased employee to tide over the financial crisis. The court noted that the delay in applying cannot be a bar if the family continues to be in need. The court relied on the principle that the right to compassionate appointment is not a vested right but a scheme to provide assistance. The court directed the respondent to consider the applications on merits, ignoring the delay, and to pass appropriate orders within three months. The petitions were allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Compassionate Appointment - Widow's Claim - Delay in Application - The petitioners, widows of deceased employees of the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation, applied for compassionate appointment after a delay of 5 to 10 years from the date of death of their husbands. The court considered whether the delay disentitled them to relief. Held that the object of compassionate appointment is to provide immediate financial assistance to the family of the deceased employee, and delay in applying cannot be a ground to reject the claim if the family continues to be in indigent circumstances. The court directed the respondent to consider the applications on merits, ignoring the delay, and to pass appropriate orders within a period of three months. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners, widows of deceased employees of the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation, are entitled to compassionate appointment despite having applied after a delay of several years from the date of death of the employee.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petitions and directed the respondent to consider the applications of the petitioners for compassionate appointment on merits, ignoring the delay, and to pass appropriate orders within a period of three months from the date of the order. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Compassionate appointment
  • Widow's right to employment
  • Delay in application
  • Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act
  • 1949
  • Section 79
  • Rule 3 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations (Appointment on Compassionate Grounds) Rules
  • 1995
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (10) 192

Writ Petition No. 12096 of 2016 with connected petitions

2016-12-22

Sangitabai W/o. Bhaskar Kamble and others

The Commissioner, Aurangabad Municipal Corporation

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking compassionate appointment for widows of deceased municipal employees.

Remedy Sought

The petitioners sought a direction to the respondent to consider their applications for compassionate appointment on merits, ignoring the delay in filing the applications.

Filing Reason

The petitioners' husbands died while in service, and their applications for compassionate appointment were rejected by the respondent solely on the ground of delay.

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to compassionate appointment despite the delay in applying. Whether the respondent's rejection of the applications on the ground of delay is sustainable in law.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners argued that they are widows of deceased employees and are in dire financial straits, and the delay in applying should not be a ground to deny compassionate appointment. The respondent contended that the applications were filed after a long delay and therefore cannot be considered.

Ratio Decidendi

The object of compassionate appointment is to provide immediate financial assistance to the family of a deceased employee. Delay in applying for compassionate appointment cannot be a ground to reject the claim if the family continues to be in indigent circumstances. The right to compassionate appointment is not a vested right but a scheme to provide assistance, and the authorities must consider the application on merits, ignoring the delay.

Judgment Excerpts

The object of compassionate appointment is to provide immediate financial assistance to the family of the deceased employee. Delay in applying for compassionate appointment cannot be a ground to reject the claim if the family continues to be in indigent circumstances.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the rejection of their applications for compassionate appointment by the Commissioner of Aurangabad Municipal Corporation.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949: Section 79
  • Maharashtra Municipal Corporations (Appointment on Compassionate Grounds) Rules, 1995: Rule 3
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Widows' Petitions for Compassionate Appointment Despite Delay in Application. Municipal Corporation Directed to Consider Applications on Merits Under Section 79 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 and Rule 3 o...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Delay in FIR Not Fatal to Claim Petition. Mere delay in lodging FIR cannot be a ground to dismiss a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 when the claimant was hospitalized...