Search Results for "MRTP Act reservation"

300 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 300 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Landowners in MRTP Act Reservation Lapse Case; Reservation Deemed Lapsed as Corporation Failed to Acquire Within Six Months of Purchase Notice. Petitioners Argue That Automatic Lapsing Under Section 127 Is Irreversible and Subsequent Notification Void.

The petitioners, owners of a parcel of land bearing CTS Nos. F/189, F/190, F/191, F/192 and Final Plot No. 646, T.P.S. No. III, Bandra, Mumbai, filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reservation on Land Due to Mapping Error and Non-Acquisition. The court quashed the reservation on the petitioner's land as the reservation chart showed a different survey number and no acquisition steps were taken for decades.

The petitioner, an agriculturist aged 77, is a joint owner of agricultural land Gat No. 933 (Old Survey No. 212/1) admeasuring 15R. In 1981, responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reservation of Land for Burial Ground in Ulhasnagar Development Plan. Petitioners, as mere occupants without title, lack standing to challenge the notification under Section 31 of the MRTP Act, 1966.

The petitioners, residents of structures on site Nos. 244 and 245 in Ulhasnagar, challenged a notification dated 23rd April 2018 issued under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Issuance of Occupation Certificate for Committed Development Under UDCPR Regulation 5.1.3. Development Permission Granted Before Draft Regional Plan Publication Protects Builder's Right to Occupation Certificate Despite Subsequent Agricultural Reservation in Regional Plan.

The petitioner, Raj Realtors, a partnership firm, constructed ten buildings comprising 446 residential and 20 commercial units on land at Mouje Pashan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Development Plan Reservation — Lapse of Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act. Landowners Entitled to Develop Lands as Acquisition Not Completed Within Ten Years.

The petitioners, owners of lands bearing Survey Nos. 103 and 104 at Kopargaon, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows TDR Claim for Land Used for Development Plan Road in Pune. Land Not a Public Street Under Section 224 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, Hence Society Entitled to Consideration for TDR.

The petitioner, Shri Chhatrapati Rajaram Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., owned land bearing Survey No.682/A at Bibavewadi, Pune. A layout plan was ...