KAHC010479002008_1
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...
Search Results for "Division Bench orders"
10013 result(s) found
Found 10013 result(s)
High Court
Karnataka High Court Refers Questions on Applicability of Payment of Gratuity Act to Temples to Full Bench. Division Bench Finds Arguable Questions Whether Temple is 'Commercial Establishment' Under Karnataka Shops Act and Whether Prior Precedent on Temple Employee's Gratuity is Correct.
1 Aug 2019The dispute arose when a former employee of Shri Mookambika Temple, Kollur, claimed gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 after his superan...
- 48
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Clause 11(5) of GR Dated 5 March 2011 Requiring Two Public Advertisements Before Extension of Age of Superannuation for Principals in Non-Government Institutions. Condition is Valid and Non-Discriminatory After Corrigendum Dated 9 May 2014 Made It Uniformly Applicable to Government Institutions.
19 Jan 2016The Bombay High Court disposed of a batch of writ petitions involving a challenge to clause 11(5) of the Government Resolution dated 5 March 2011, whi...
- 12
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds Constitutional Validity of Explanation to Section 6(5) of Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 — Partition by Execution of Registered Deed or Court Decree is Valid and Not Unconstitutional. The court held that the Explanation defining partition as only by registered deed or court decree is within legislative competence and does not violate fundamental rights.
19 Feb 2015The petitioners, legal representatives of the original petitioner Puttalinganagouda @ Veeranagouda B Patil, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 a...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Full Bench Considers Maintainability of Suit Against Gratuitous Licensee Under Section 41 of Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882. Dispute Arises from Eviction Suit Filed Before Small Cause Court, Challenged for Lack of Jurisdiction Over Gratuitous Licence.
10 Jul 2007The dispute arose from a suit for eviction filed in the Court of Small Causes at Bombay under section 41 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 188...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Teacher for Misconduct in Minority School — Procedural Compliance Under MEPS Act Not Required for Unauthorized Absence. Termination of a probationary teacher for unauthorized absence and misconduct is valid even without prior approval under Section 5 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977, as the school is a minority institution and the teacher was on probation.
30 Nov -0001The judgment involves three writ petitions challenging termination of teachers by private schools claiming minority status. The lead petition is by Ra...
- 175
High Court
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2486 OF 2005
30 Nov 2005The suit was filed by shareholders of Spice Jet Ltd, a domestic airline company formerly known as Modi Luft, which had undergone several ownership cha...
- 12
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice — Notice Sent by Registered Post to Wrong Address Not Valid Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
25 Jul 2005The petitioners, M/s Indo International Ltd. and U.M. Lodha, were the original accused in a complaint filed by the respondent-complainant under Sectio...
- 136
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.
3 Dec 2015The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...
- 38
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases Under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Constitutional Validity of Section 98A and Notification Examined. The petitioners contended that the notification dated 16.08.2008 and demand of forest development tax from holders of mining leases in forest areas were repugnant to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and ultra vires the State's legislative competence.
3 Dec 2015A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various entities inc...
- 57
