Search Results for "Dilatory tactics"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Dilatory tactics"

119 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 119 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Appeal Against High Court's Framing of Points for Determination in Eviction Proceedings Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Pre-Determining Issues for Inquiry Officer in Summary Eviction Proceedings, Thereby Delaying Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants of Public Premises.

10 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others against the common judgment and order of the Bom...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Petitioner to Lead Evidence in Civil Suit Despite Closure Order, Imposing Costs for Dilatory Conduct. The court set aside the trial court's order closing evidence of PW1, granting one final opportunity with costs of Rs. 5,000 to each respondent.

25 Nov 2016

The petitioner, Ignatius Tony Pereira, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 2.9.2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, V...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Jurisdiction of District Judge in Execution Proceedings. Court Holds That Execution Can Be Transferred to Competent Court and District Judge Has Power Under Section 47 CPC.

23 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Sri R. Raghu, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the jurisdiction of the 1st Additional ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Recall of Witnesses Under Section 311 Cr.P.C. in Murder Trial Due to Advocate's Illness. The court held that the right to cross-examination is a vital component of fair trial and the trial court's rejection of recall application was too technical, quashing the order and directing recall of PWs 2, 3, and 11.

4 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Suresh, was being prosecuted for the offence of murder punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in Sessions Case No...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Dismissal of Arbitration Suit for Non-Compliance of Court Order. Petitioner Failed to Pay Costs as Directed, Leading to Dismissal Under Order IX Rule 8 CPC.

2 Jun 2015

The petitioner, M/s Crompton Greaves Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 2...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Pre-Deposit Condition in Central Excise Remand Order — Condition of Rs.40 Lakhs Deposit Set Aside as Unwarranted. CESTAT Cannot Impose Pre-Deposit Condition While Remanding Matter for De Novo Adjudication Under Central Excise Act, 1944.

26 Feb 2015

The appellant, M/s Dhariwal Industries Limited, a manufacturer of Panmasala and Gutka registered under the Central Excise Act, 1944, was issued a show...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application for Certified Copy of Will Under Section 57 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 — Held That Application for Certified Copy of Will Cannot Be Rejected on Ground That Will Was Not Registered or That Probate Was Not Obtained.

24 Sep 2010

The petitioners, who are the legal heirs of the deceased Shrimantrao Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 24.11.2009 passed by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Filing of Written Statement to Counterclaim Beyond 90 Days — Condonation of Delay Granted Due to Court Vacations and Lack of Objection. Order 8 Rule 6A CPC does not prescribe a specific period for filing written statement to counterclaim; the period of 90 days under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC is directory and not mandatory.

2 Jul 2010

The petitioners, who are the plaintiffs in Regular Civil Suit No.177/2007/A, challenged the order dated 20-8-2009 of the learned Civil Judge, Senior D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Accused's Petition to Recall Complainant for Cross-Examination in Criminal Case — Right to Fair Trial Upheld Despite Delay. The court set aside orders rejecting recall application and directed trial court to permit further cross-examination subject to payment of costs of Rs. 500 to the complainant.

12 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Siddharth Dashrath Deshpande, was the accused in Criminal Case No. 609/2008 pending before the trial court at Darwha, arising from a c...

10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)