Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application for Certified Copy of Will Under Section 57 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 — Held That Application for Certified Copy of Will Cannot Be Rejected on Ground That Will Was Not Registered or That Probate Was Not Obtained.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, who are the legal heirs of the deceased Shrimantrao Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 24.11.2009 passed by the Civil Judge Junior Division, Latur, rejecting their application for a certified copy of the Will dated 08.08.1995 executed by Shrimantrao Patil. The Will was deposited in the Court of Civil Judge Junior Division, Latur, and the petitioners sought a certified copy thereof. The Civil Judge rejected the application on the ground that the Will was not registered and that probate was not obtained. The petitioners contended that under Section 57 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, read with Section 74 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, they are entitled to obtain a certified copy of the Will as it is a public document deposited in a Court of law. The respondent, who was the original respondent in the application, opposed the petition, arguing that the Will was not registered and that probate was necessary. The High Court, after hearing both sides, held that the application for a certified copy of the Will cannot be rejected on the ground that the Will was not registered or that probate was not obtained. The Court observed that Section 57 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, read with Section 74 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, clearly entitles any person to obtain a certified copy of a Will deposited in a Court of law. The Court further noted that the Will was deposited in the Court of Civil Judge Junior Division, Latur, and therefore, it is a public document. The Court set aside the impugned order and directed the Civil Judge Junior Division, Latur, to issue a certified copy of the Will to the petitioners within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the writ. The writ petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Succession Law - Certified Copy of Will - Section 57 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Right to Obtain Certified Copy - The petitioners, legal heirs of the testator, applied for a certified copy of the Will dated 08.08.1995 deposited in the Court of Civil Judge Junior Division, Latur. The Court rejected the application on the ground that the Will was not registered and probate was not obtained. The High Court held that Section 57 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, read with Section 74 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, entitles any person to obtain a certified copy of a Will deposited in a Court of law, irrespective of registration or probate. The Court directed the Civil Judge to issue a certified copy of the Will to the petitioners. (Paras 4-6)

B) Evidence Law - Certified Copy of Public Document - Section 74 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Will Deposited in Court - A Will deposited in a Court of law is a public document under Section 74 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and any person is entitled to obtain a certified copy thereof. The Court rejected the contention that probate is a prerequisite for obtaining a certified copy, holding that the right to obtain a certified copy is independent of the requirement of probate. (Para 5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners are entitled to obtain a certified copy of the Will dated 08.08.1995 executed by Shrimantrao Patil under Section 57 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and whether the Civil Judge Junior Division, Latur, was justified in rejecting the application for certified copy on the ground that the Will was not registered and probate was not obtained.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 24.11.2009 passed by the Civil Judge Junior Division, Latur, is quashed and set aside. The Civil Judge Junior Division, Latur, is directed to issue a certified copy of the Will dated 08.08.1995 to the petitioners within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the writ. Rule is made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Section 57 of Indian Succession Act
  • 1925
  • Section 74 of Indian Evidence Act
  • 1872
  • Right to obtain certified copy of a will
  • Distinction between probate and certified copy
  • Applicability of Indian Succession Act to Hindu wills
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (09) 16

Writ Petition No.1423 of 2010

2010-09-24

Shrihari P. Davare

Shri S.S. Halkude for petitioners, Shri P.S. Dighe holding for Shri V.R. Dhorde for respondent

Chandrakant s/o Shrimantrao Patil and others

Vikas s/o Balaji Parsewar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging rejection of application for certified copy of a Will.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ to quash the order dated 24.11.2009 passed by the Civil Judge Junior Division, Latur, and to direct the Civil Judge to issue a certified copy of the Will dated 08.08.1995.

Filing Reason

The Civil Judge Junior Division, Latur, rejected the petitioners' application for a certified copy of the Will on the ground that the Will was not registered and probate was not obtained.

Previous Decisions

The Civil Judge Junior Division, Latur, passed order dated 24.11.2009 rejecting the application for certified copy.

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to obtain a certified copy of the Will under Section 57 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, read with Section 74 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Whether the Civil Judge was justified in rejecting the application for certified copy on the ground that the Will was not registered and probate was not obtained.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that under Section 57 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, read with Section 74 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, they are entitled to obtain a certified copy of the Will as it is a public document deposited in a Court of law. Respondent argued that the Will was not registered and probate was not obtained, and therefore the application for certified copy was rightly rejected.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 57 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, read with Section 74 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, any person is entitled to obtain a certified copy of a Will deposited in a Court of law, irrespective of whether the Will is registered or probate has been obtained. The Will deposited in Court is a public document, and the right to obtain a certified copy is independent of the requirement of probate.

Judgment Excerpts

Section 57 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, read with Section 74 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, clearly entitles any person to obtain a certified copy of a Will deposited in a Court of law. The application for certified copy of the Will cannot be rejected on the ground that the Will was not registered or that probate was not obtained.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed an application before the Civil Judge Junior Division, Latur, for a certified copy of the Will dated 08.08.1995. The Civil Judge rejected the application by order dated 24.11.2009. Aggrieved, the petitioners filed the present writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, which was heard and disposed of on 24.09.2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Succession Act, 1925: 57
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: 74
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application for Certified Copy of Will Under Section 57 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 — Held That Application for Certified Copy of Will Cannot Be Rejected on Ground That Will Was Not...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Settlement Between Parties. Court holds that continuation of proceedings after amicable settlement would be an abuse of process of law under Section 482 CrPC.