Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

1515 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1515 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award Under Sections 46 and 47 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Dispute Arises from International Sale of Steel Coils Where Italian Company Sought to Enforce Award Against Indian Steel Manufacturer.

13 Oct 2015

The case concerns a petition filed under Sections 46 and 47 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking enforcement of a foreign arbitral a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Fresh Arbitration After Supreme Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award Without Deciding Merits — Observations in Setting Aside Award Do Not Constitute Res Judicata. The Court held that setting aside an arbitral award under Sections 34/37 does not adjudicate the merits, and parties are free to arbitrate afresh under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

11 Mar 2025

The applicant, Batliboi Environmental Engineering Ltd., had entered into a contract with Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL) for construction ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Railway Contract Dispute Despite Non-Compliance with Pre-Arbitration Notice Period. The court held that the respondent's failure to respond to the notice and its conduct constituted waiver of the 30-day notice requirement under Clause 64(3)(b)(ii) of the Indian Railways Standard General Conditions of Contract.

3 Apr 2024

The applicant, S. N. Naik & Brothers, a proprietary concern, entered into a contract with the Union of India (respondent) on 23.09.2019 for constructi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Broker-Client Dispute Over Margin Shortfall and Unauthorized Sale of Shares. Court upholds concurrent findings of arbitral tribunals that broker was entitled to sell shares to cover margin deficit under Member Client Agreement and bye-laws of National Stock Exchange.

6 Aug 2015

The petitioner, Ankit Bimal Deorah, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitration Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Validity of Award Based on Partnership Deed and Evidence. Court Held That Arbitrator's Findings on Dissolution and Accounts Were Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

10 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Vinod Kumar Saraf, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Over Coal Supply Contracts — Failure to Provide Load Port Report Constitutes Dispute. Court holds that existence of arbitration clause and failure of respondent to appoint arbitrator entitles petitioner to seek appointment under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

29 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Era International, a partnership firm engaged in importing coal, entered into three sale contracts with the respondent, Aditya Birla G...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Upholds Award of Damages for Unauthorized Share Transactions. Court holds that arbitral tribunal's findings on unauthorized trades and liability of broker are not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Kotak Securities Limited, a registered stock broker, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Commodity Trading Dispute — Holds That Arbitral Tribunal Erred in Rejecting Claim for Unauthorized Trades Without Considering Evidence of Unauthorized Transactions.

9 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Mrs. Kaberi Mondal, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging portions of an arbitr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bank of India's Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act — Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. The Court held that the arbitrator's award of interest on pre-reference period without contractual basis and failure to consider bank's counterclaim amounted to patent illegality and denial of opportunity.

3 Nov 2025

The case involves a petition filed by Bank of India under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award pass...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petitions Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Upholding Arbitral Tribunal's Refusal of Interim Relief for Possession of Flats. Arbitral Tribunal's Discretion in Denying Interim Measures Under Section 17 Upheld, as No Patent Illegality or Perversity Demonstrated in Orders Dated February 14, 2019 and December 15, 2022.

5 Mar 2026

The dispute originated from a Joint Development Agreement dated August 20, 2009, between the Owner (late Petitioners, represented by legal heirs) and ...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)