KAHC010051142020_1
24 Jul 2020...
Search Results for "technical plea"
1662 result(s) found
Found 1662 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Injunction Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Finding of Possession in Favor of Plaintiffs. The court held that the appellant-defendant failed to prove her title and possession over the suit property, and the plaintiffs established their prior possession and entitlement to injunction under Section 38 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.
9 Dec 2020The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the unsuccessful defendant No.2, C.N. Leelava...
- 158
High Court
- 59
High Court
Gujarat High Court Allows Second Appeal in Will Dispute — Sets Aside Appellate Judgment for Failure to Consider Evidence on Testamentary Capacity. The Court holds that the First Appellate Court failed to independently assess evidence regarding the testator's mental capacity and the validity of the Will, and remands the matter for fresh consideration.
6 Feb 2026The present second appeal arises from a dispute concerning the validity of a Will dated 15.04.1986 executed by Reshiabhai, the grandfather of appellan...
- 148
High Court
Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Agreement to Sale Not Proved as Defendants Denied Execution and Plaintiffs Failed to Establish Readiness and Willingness.
10 Feb 2026The present second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sale ...
- 35
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Sale Agreement — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Time was not of essence but plaintiff's conduct showed lack of continuous readiness, disentitling him to discretionary relief under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.
12 Feb 2026The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement dated 09.03.2006 for 51 cents of land at Rs.25,000 per cent. He paid...
- 124
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Exclusion of 467 Days Under Section 14 of Limitation Act for Filing Section 34 Application Under Arbitration Act. The court held that Section 14 of the Limitation Act does not apply to applications under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the Union of India failed to demonstrate due diligence.
24 Apr 2017The petitioner, M/s DDL Excavation Pvt. Ltd., and the respondent, Union of India (UOI), entered into an agreement for execution of works in Goa. Dispu...
- 160
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Maritime Board Dispute Over Cargo Handling Charges. Court sets aside majority award directing payment at Rs.3 per metric tonne, remits matter for fresh consideration on applicability of 1995 or 1996 policy.
22 Jun 2017The Maharashtra Maritime Board (Claimant) filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging a m...
- 105
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Conditional Leave to Defend in Commercial Summary Suit Based on Dishonoured Cheque — Reduces Deposit Amount from Full Cheque Value to 50%. The court held that a triable defence of blank cheque issuance warrants a less onerous condition for leave to defend under Order 37 CPC and Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
11 Jun 2018The case arises from a Commercial Summary Suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff (Motilal Laxmichand Salecha HUF) against the appellant/defendant (Mou...
- 194
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Examine Attesting Witnesses. Execution of Agreement Not Duly Proved Under Section 68 of the Evidence Act, 1872, as Attesting Witnesses Were Not Examined.
29 Jun 2018The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 01.06.2005 filed by the respondent-plaintiff (Ashish Jain) against the...
- 71
