Search Results for "mandatory meeting date"

1710 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1710 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Vice-Chancellor of Pune University; Holds No Violation of Prescribed Qualifications. Court Finds that Petitioner Failed to Prove That Incumbent Lacked Essential Qualifications Under the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.

A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Dr. Prabhakar J. Lavakare challenging the appointment of Respondent No.4, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Professor Selection in Marathi Department. Court Upholds Selection Committee's Discretion in Assessing API Scores and Interview Performance, Affirms Appellate Authority's Order Under Section 76(7) of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.

The petitioner, Dr. Pramod Munghate, challenged the selection and appointment of respondent No.3 as Professor in Marathi at the University of Mumbai. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PILs Challenging Bye-Elections to Parliamentary Constituencies for Lack of Merit. Section 151A of Representation of the People Act, 1951 does not mandate simultaneous elections; bye-elections can be held separately.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed as public interest litigations challenging the Election Commission of India's decision to conduc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Section 9 Petition Seeking Interim Measures in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. The petition pertained to disputes between maritime entities and sought urgent interlocutory reliefs pending constitution of the arbitral tribunal.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a Commercial Arbitration Petition (L) No. 7499 of 2025 filed by Alphard Maritime Ltd. against Samson Mari...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award in Favour of Claimant. Court Holds That Single Judge Erred in Reappreciating Evidence and Interfering with Arbitrator's Findings on Quantum and Interest.

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Paramount Limited (appellant) against the judgmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Challenge to Arbitrator's Interlocutory Order on Summoning of Documents. Court Considers Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Interlocutory Orders Under Articles 226 and 227 in Light of SBP & Co. v. Patel Engineering.

The dispute arose between Dodballapur Integrated Textile Park Limited and the claimants, Vinod G. Jain and Premalatha G. Jain, under a sub-lease agree...