Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition and Application for Appointment of Arbitrator Due to Absence of Arbitration Agreement. Cargo Handling Contract Did Not Contain Arbitration Clause, and Subsequent Correspondence Did Not Constitute an Arbitration Agreement Under Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 49
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, NAS Aviation Services India Pvt. Ltd., filed an Arbitration Application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an arbitrator and an Arbitration Petition under Section 9 of the Act for interim reliefs, both arising from a cargo handling contract with the respondent, Kingfisher Airlines Limited. The contract was entered into on 22 June 2009. The petitioner claimed that the respondent owed dues of around Rs.9 crores, of which only Rs.60 lakhs was received, and sought to invoke arbitration based on certain correspondence. The respondent raised a preliminary objection that there was no arbitration agreement between the parties. The court examined the contract and the correspondence relied upon by the petitioner. The contract did not contain any arbitration clause. The letters exchanged between the parties, including a letter dated 23 September 2009 from the petitioner calling upon the respondent to pay dues, did not contain any reference to arbitration or an agreement to refer disputes to arbitration. The court held that for an arbitration agreement to exist, it must be in writing and contain a clear intention to refer disputes to arbitration. The mere mention of arbitration in subsequent correspondence, without acceptance by the other party, does not constitute an arbitration agreement. The court concluded that there was no arbitration agreement between the parties, and therefore, the Arbitration Application under Section 11 and the Arbitration Petition under Section 9 were not maintainable. Both were dismissed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Arbitration Law - Existence of Arbitration Agreement - Section 7, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - The court considered whether a cargo handling contract and subsequent correspondence contained an arbitration agreement. The contract did not contain an arbitration clause, and the letters relied upon by the petitioner did not evidence an agreement to arbitrate. Held that no arbitration agreement exists between the parties (Paras 3-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether there exists an arbitration agreement between the parties to refer the disputes to arbitration.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both the Arbitration Application and the Arbitration Petition are dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Arbitration agreement must be in writing
  • existence of arbitration agreement is a jurisdictional prerequisite
  • Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • 1996
  • Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (02) 92

Arbitration Petition No.456 of 2013 with Arbitration Application No.151 of 2013

2014-02-28

N.M. Jamdar, J.

Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar a/w Mr. Dinesh Parmar a/w Mr. Kedar Oak i/by M/s. DSR Legal for the Petitioner/Applicant. Mr. Rohaan Cama i/by M/s. Bachubhai Munim & Co. for the Respondent.

NAS Aviation Services India Pvt. Ltd.

Kingfisher Airlines Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Arbitration petition for interim relief under Section 9 and application for appointment of arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought appointment of an arbitrator and interim reliefs pending arbitral proceedings.

Filing Reason

Dispute regarding unpaid dues under a cargo handling contract.

Issues

Whether there exists an arbitration agreement between the parties.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the contract and subsequent correspondence contained an arbitration agreement. Respondent contended that there was no arbitration agreement between the parties.

Ratio Decidendi

For an arbitration agreement to exist, it must be in writing and contain a clear intention to refer disputes to arbitration. The mere mention of arbitration in correspondence, without acceptance by the other party, does not constitute an arbitration agreement under Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Judgment Excerpts

A contention has been raised by the Respondent that there is no arbitration agreement between the parties. The contract does not contain any arbitration clause. The letters relied upon by the Petitioner do not evidence an agreement to arbitrate.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Arbitration Application No.151 of 2013 under Section 11 for appointment of an arbitrator and Arbitration Petition No.456 of 2013 under Section 9 for interim reliefs. Both were taken up for final disposal together. The respondent raised a preliminary objection regarding the existence of an arbitration agreement.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 7, Section 9, Section 11
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Revision Petition in NA Permission Case, Quashes Rejection Orders for Lack of Proper Application of Mind. Revenue Authorities Cannot Reject NA Permission on Ground of Unclear Title Without Providing Opportunity to Produce Ti...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition and Application for Appointment of Arbitrator Due to Absence of Arbitration Agreement. Cargo Handling Contract Did Not Contain Arbitration Clause, and Subsequent Correspondence Did Not Constitute an Ar...