Search Results for "exception period six years"

1723 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1723 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Prosecution for Export of Antiquities — Prosecution Under Customs Act Not Barred by Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972. Held that the Customs Act, 1962 applies alongside the Antiquities Act, and prosecution under Sections 132 and 135 is maintainable.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court upholding the discharge of the respondent, Sharad Gandhi, from offences under Sections 132 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband and In-Laws for Murder by Burning in Dowry Death Case. Life Imprisonment Maintained Under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC Based on Dying Declaration and Circumstantial Evidence.

The case arises from a criminal appeal filed by four accused persons (husband, father-in-law, brother-in-law, and mother-in-law of the deceased) again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Ex-Employee of WCL Challenging Reduction in Pay Scale Due to Medical Disability. Reduction from Category-IV to Category-I without considering alternative employment in same pay scale violates Clause 9.4.0 of NCWA-VI and principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Gunwanta Govinda, was appointed as a Time Rated Category employee in Pipla Colliery of Western Coalfields Limited (WCL) on 16/02/1981....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workmen's Petitions Challenging Labour Court's Refusal of Interim Relief in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints. Petitioners Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case of Victimization Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The judgment pertains to a group of writ petitions filed by workmen (original complainants) against SKF India Ltd and its General Manager (HR), challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Allotment of Land to Judges' Cooperative Housing Society. Allotment of land by MHADA to a cooperative housing society formed by judges was held to be legal and not arbitrary.

The petitioner, Ketan Tirodkar, a citizen of India, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the allotment of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRL.A(MD)No.242 of 2022

The present criminal appeal was filed by the sole accused, Balamurugan, challenging the judgment and conviction rendered in S.C.No.116 of 2019 dated 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Sets Aside Concurrent Findings. Court holds that second wife and her children are entitled to share in joint family property as coparceners under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the first wife and her daughters against the husband and his second wife and children. The trial court and...