CRL.A(MD)No.242 of 2022

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Madurai
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present criminal appeal was filed by the sole accused, Balamurugan, challenging the judgment and conviction rendered in S.C.No.116 of 2019 dated 23.09.2021 by the Sessions Judge, Mahalir Court (Fast Track Mahila Court), Thoothukudi. The prosecution case was that on 23.01.2019, a wordy quarrel occurred between the accused and P.W.1, Kaleeswari, the granddaughter of the deceased Arumuga Perumal. The accused, provoked by P.W.1 reprimanding her children, got into an altercation. At about 4.30 p.m., when P.W.1 went to purchase groceries, the accused followed her with an aruval. P.W.1 was alerted by P.W.2 and P.W.3. The deceased, who intervened to prevent the assault, was attacked by the accused. The accused abused P.W.1, then attacked the deceased with the aruval; the deceased raised his left forearm to protect his head and sustained an injury. The accused again attacked the deceased on his head with the aruval, causing a grievous injury. The deceased was taken to the hospital immediately but succumbed to the injuries on 03.02.2019 after 12 days of treatment. The accused also threatened the witnesses with dire consequences, leading to a charge under Section 506(ii) of the Indian Penal Code. The trial court framed charges under Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Women from Harassment Act, Section 302 and Section 506(ii) of the Indian Penal Code, and convicted the accused. The appellant, aggrieved by the conviction and sentence, filed the present appeal under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to set aside the conviction. The arguments and the court’s analysis on the merits of the appeal were not included in the provided excerpt, and the final decision of the High Court was not available.

Issue of Consideration

CRL.A(MD)No.242 of 2022

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (03) 205

CRL.A(MD)No.242 of 2022

2025-03-24

Dr. G. Jayachandran, R. Poornima

Mr. R. Alagumani, Mr. A. Thiruvadi Kumar

Balamurugan

The State, through The Inspector of Police, Kayathar Police Station, Thoothukudi District (In Crime No.11 of 2019)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC and harassment under Tamil Nadu Prevention of Women from Harassment Act.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to set aside the conviction and sentence imposed by the Sessions Court.

Filing Reason

The accused was convicted for allegedly attacking the deceased with an aruval after a quarrel, causing his death.

Previous Decisions

The Sessions Court convicted the accused under Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prevention of Women from Harassment Act and Sections 302 and 506(ii) of IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

Kaleeswari, grand-daughter of the deceased by name, Arumuga Perumal gave a complaint to the Kayathar Police Station on 23.1.2019 at 20.00 hours... the accused residing opposite to the house of P.W.1 on 23.1.2019 at about 4.15 p.m got provoked by P.W.1 reprimanding her childen playing in the street as if P.W.1 is scolding the mother of the accused... the accused after abusing P.W.1 with all abusive words and attacked Arumugaperumal with Aruval.

Procedural History

The accused was tried in S.C.No.116 of 2019 by the Sessions Court and convicted on 23.09.2021. The accused filed the present criminal appeal under Section 374 CrPC before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 506(ii)
  • Tamil Nadu Prevention of Women from Harassment Act: 4
  • Criminal Procedure Code, 1973: 374
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court CRL.A(MD)No.242 of 2022
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Transport Undertaking in Motor Accident Claim for Deceased Minor Student — Negligence of Bus Conductor and Driver Established. Tribunal's Award of Rs.22,79,100/- with 8% Interest Upheld as Appellant Failed to P...