Search Results for "delay penalty"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "delay penalty"

1544 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1544 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against MCGM for Lease Renewal and Conveyance of Leasehold Plot. Court holds that delay in registration of assignment deed does not invalidate assignment and that lessee is entitled to renewal and conveyance under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

1 Mar 2024

The petitioners, Kesar Corporation, Troika Constructions Company, and Dattashram Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition against the M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pensionary Benefits to Retired Employee Despite Upholding Removal Order Due to Delay. Petitioner's challenge to removal dismissed as barred by laches, but court directs payment of pension and gratuity as per rules.

28 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Chandrashekhar s/o Devidas Deshmukh, a retired Tax Collector from Amravati Municipal Corporation, filed a writ petition challenging an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Directors in Dishonour of Cheque Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations and Non-Impleadment of Company. Vicarious liability under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 requires specific averments and company must be made accused.

18 Jan 2023

The petitioners, Harry Inder Dhaul, Narayan Singh Pathania, and Mikhail s/o Harry Dhaul, were directors of Siddhayu Ayurvedic Research Foundation Priv...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of MLAs Under Tenth Schedule. Speaker's Order Upheld as Valid Exercise of Constitutional Authority Under Article 191(2) and Paragraph 2(1)(a) of Tenth Schedule.

2 May 2023

The petitioner, Girish Chodankar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the order of the Speaker of the Goa Legislat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Suspension Order and KSAT Dismissal in Police Disciplinary Matter — Suspension Order Quashed for Non-Compliance with Rule 10A of Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966. The court held that failure to review suspension within 90 days renders continued suspension invalid and directed reinstatement of the petitioner.

10 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Sri Kishore Kumar B.K. (also referred to as Sri B.K. Kishore Kumar), a Police Inspector in the Internal Security Division (ISD) of Kar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Challenge to Compensation Order in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer Not Liable for Interest on Delayed Payment as Delay Was Due to Court Proceedings. Commissioner's Order for Interest Under Section 4A(3) of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 Set Aside as Employer Had Deposited Amount Within Time.

12 Dec 2011

The petitioner, Shrikrishna Saw Mill, through its proprietor Rasiklal Walji Patel, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 09-02-2010 passed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Construction in Powai and Tirandaz — No Breach of Tripartite Agreement or ULC Act Exemption Found. The court held that the construction was in accordance with sanctioned plans and permissions, and the challenge to the exemption order was barred by delay and laches.

22 Feb 2012

The judgment concerns three Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed by Kamlakar Motiram Satve, Rajendra Thacker, and Medha Patkar challenging the con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Holds That Arbitral Tribunal Erred in Rejecting Claims Without Proper Consideration of Contractual Provisions and Evidence. The court found that the tribunal's interpretation of the price variation clause, extra items, and compensation for delay was perverse and contrary to the plain language of the contract, warranting interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Chenab Bridge Project Undertaking, a joint venture contractor, was awarded a construction contract by the respondent, Konkan Railway C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Terminates Arbitrator's Mandate for Failure to Render Award and Excessive Fees — Substitute Arbitrator Appointed Under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court held that failure to render award within reasonable time and demanding excessive fees constitute failure to act under Section 14(1)(a) of the Act.

16 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Parekh Industries Limited, filed a petition under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking terminatio...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Review Application in Panchayat Construction Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Review of order quashing demolition direction refused as applicant failed to demonstrate any error apparent on face of record or that the Goa Regularization of Unauthorized Construction Act, 2016 was not considered.

12 Apr 2019

The case involves a Civil Review Application filed by Mrs. Ana Maria Vaz, the respondent in the original Writ Petition No. 49/2018, seeking review of ...

114 115 116 117 118

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)