Search Results for "Rural Development"

1366 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1366 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Widow Seeking Pension and Pensionary Benefits of Deceased Teacher. Court Directs Payment of Pension and Gratuity Despite Pending Heirship Dispute.

The petitioner, Smt. Tilottama Sharad Bansi, is the widow of Sharad Ramlal Bansi, who was employed as an assistant teacher at respondent No.5 school (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation of Delhi's Petition Seeking Mandamus Against State of Maharashtra to Execute Distress Warrants. Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 Has No Extra-Territorial Application, Hence No Duty on Maharashtra Authorities.

The Petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), a statutory body under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, filed a writ petition in the B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch for Violation of Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Bombay Village Panchayats (Meeting) Rules, 1959. No-confidence motion invalid as three-day notice not given to Sarpanch and motion not properly moved for voting.

The petitioner, Nirmala w/o Pandharinath Sarde (Shiralkar), was the Sarpanch of Shirala Village Panchayat. On 22.12.2023, an extraordinary meeting was...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch in No-Confidence Motion for Violation of Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Bombay Village Panchayats (Meeting) Rules, 1959. Failure to Provide Three Days' Notice to Sarpanch Renders No-Confidence Motion Invalid.

The petitioner, Nirmala w/o Pandharinath Sarde (Shiralkar), was the Sarpanch of Shirala Village Panchayat. She was removed from the post by a no-confi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Sarpanch Election Due to Non-Compliance with Secret Ballot Requirement. Election of Sarpanch set aside for violation of Rule 8(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Sarpanch and Deputy Sarpanch) Election Rules, 1964, which mandates secret ballot.

The petitioner, Vaishali Chaburao Katore, a member of Grampanchayat Nimgaon Khalu, challenged the election of respondent no.4, Shankar Ramdas Shinde, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Denial of Compassionate Appointment Due to Third Child Born After 2001. Clause-E of Government Resolution dated 28-3-2001 held constitutional and not violative of Article 14 as it promotes family planning.

The petitioner, Musaddique Ahmad Khan, is the son of a deceased Assistant Teacher, Muqaddar Khan Mumtaz Khan, who died in harness on 2 September 2015....