Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment Despite Third Child Born Before Cut-Off Date — Small Family Norm Not Applicable Retrospectively. The court held that the Government Resolution dated 28.03.2005 prescribing a small family norm for recruitment does not apply to children born before the cut-off date, and thus the petitioner was not disqualified from compassionate appointment.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Ranjita Gautam Sadashiv, filed a writ petition seeking compassionate appointment in place of her husband, a Secondary School Teacher who died on 05.03.2016. The legal impediment was that the petitioner had three children, with the third child born on 12.10.2004, after the cut-off date of 31.12.2001 prescribed by a Government Resolution dated 28.03.2001. However, the petitioner relied on a subsequent notification dated 28.03.2005 issued by the Deputy Secretary, State of Maharashtra, which prescribed a small family norm as an essential qualification for recruitment, with a cut-off date of 28.03.2005. The court considered the notification and found that it pertained only to recruitment in government departments and that the petitioner's third child was born before the cut-off date of 28.03.2005. Therefore, the bar on having more than two children would not apply. The court also noted that the petitioner had received Rs.17,79,266/- in service benefits and was receiving a monthly pension of Rs.33,000/-. The court allowed the petition, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's application for compassionate appointment without applying the small family norm bar, and to pass appropriate orders within four weeks.

Headnote

A) Compassionate Appointment - Small Family Norm - Cut-off Date - Government Resolution dated 28.03.2005 - The petitioner's third child was born on 12.10.2004, before the cut-off date of 28.03.2005 prescribed by the Government Resolution. The court held that the bar on having more than two children would not apply to children born before the cut-off date, and thus the petitioner was not disqualified from seeking compassionate appointment. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the small family norm requiring not more than two children, as per Government Resolution dated 28.03.2005, applies to compassionate appointment when the third child was born before the cut-off date of 28.03.2005.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to consider the petitioner's application for compassionate appointment without applying the small family norm bar, and to pass appropriate orders within four weeks.

Law Points

  • Compassionate appointment
  • small family norm
  • cut-off date
  • retrospective application
  • Government Resolution dated 28.03.2005
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (01) 86

Writ Petition No. 15582 of 2023

2024-01-03

Ravindra V. Ghuge, Y. G. Khobragade

2024:BHC-AUG:386-DB

Mr. D. R. Irale Patil for Petitioner, Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for Respondent No.1, Mr. P. D. Suryawanshi for Respondent No.2

Ranjita Gautam Sadashiv

The State of Maharashtra, The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Jalna

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking compassionate appointment

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeks appointment on compassionate basis in place of her deceased husband

Filing Reason

Petitioner's application for compassionate appointment was opposed on the ground that she has three children, with the third child born after the cut-off date of 31.12.2001

Issues

Whether the small family norm bar applies to compassionate appointment when the third child was born before the cut-off date of 28.03.2005

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner relies on notification dated 28.03.2005 which prescribes cut-off date of 28.03.2005 for small family norm; her third child born on 12.10.2004 is before that date. Respondent Zilla Parishad submits that petitioner has received Rs.17,79,266/- in service benefits and receives Rs.33,000/- per month pension.

Ratio Decidendi

The small family norm prescribed by Government Resolution dated 28.03.2005 applies only to children born after the cut-off date of 28.03.2005. Since the petitioner's third child was born on 12.10.2004, before the cut-off date, the bar does not apply to her compassionate appointment.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned Advocate for the Petitioner places reliance upon a notification dated 28.03.2005... to support the contention that the said notification requires a declaration of small family as one of the essential qualifications for recruitment... As the Petitioner’s third child is born on 12.10.2004, the bar on having more than two children prior to the date of the notification, would not be an impediment for the Petitioner to seek compassionate appointment.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 15582 of 2023 before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking compassionate appointment. The petition was heard and finally disposed of on 03.01.2024.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment Despite Third Child Born Before Cut-Off Date — Small Family Norm Not Applicable Retrospectively. The court held that the Government Resolution dated 28.03.2005 prescribing a small family norm for r...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Refund Reduced to Rs. 3 Lakhs Due to Lack of Proof of Additional Payment. The High Court's finding that the plaintiff failed to prove payment of Rs. 15,00,000/- additional ad...