Search Results for "incorrect statement"

3149 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3149 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Property Dispute Over Will — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review under Section 114 CPC read with Order 47 Rule 1 CPC cannot be used to re-argue the case or correct erroneous findings unless there is an error apparent on the face of the record.

The applicants (original appellants) filed a review application under Section 114 read with Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Broker-Client Dispute. Court Upholds Award Directing Payment of Rs.1,58,39,459.87 but Refuses Interest and Costs Under Section 34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Harinarayan Bajaj, entered into various share transactions on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) through the respondent, Madhukar Sheth, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Commodity Trading Dispute — Holds That Arbitral Tribunal Erred in Rejecting Claim for Unauthorized Trades Without Considering Evidence of Unauthorized Transactions.

The petitioner, Mrs. Kaberi Mondal, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging portions of an arbitr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Appeals Filed by Upa-Lokayukta Against Dismissal of Writ Petition Challenging Communication Under Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 – Single Judge Held Petition Not Maintainable

The appellant, Justice Subhash B. Adi, is the incumbent Upa-Lokayukta of Karnataka, appointed in 2013 under the Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984. On 27 N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Interim Injunction Application in Trademark Infringement Suit Concerning 'REGAL' Footwear Mark. Registered Proprietor Seeks Injunction Against Identical Mark Used by Defendant for Footwear Retail, Raising Prior Use and Acquiescence Defences.

The dispute arose in the Commercial Division of the Bombay High Court in a suit for trademark infringement and passing off concerning the mark 'REGAL'...