Search Results for "arbitral tribunal jurisdiction"

1548 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1548 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Whether Aurangabad Court Had Territorial Jurisdiction Under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act for Property in Hingoli. District Court Held It Lacked Jurisdiction; Appeal Outcome Not Provided.

The dispute arose out of a partnership firm, M/s Kasliwal Empire, formed by the appellant and respondent on 7.3.2007 for developing housing projects. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Lack of Arbitration Agreement. Court holds that arbitration agreement must be in writing and cannot be inferred from correspondence or court order.

The case involves an appeal against a judgment of a Learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, which set aside an arbitral award under Section 34 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Derivative Transaction Dispute Based on Signed ISDA Agreement. Court Finds No Ground to Interfere Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Arbitrator's Findings on Enforceability Are Reasonable.

The dispute arose from two foreign exchange derivative transactions entered into between Sporting India Limited (the Petitioner) and HDFC Bank Limited...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Pipeline Construction Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitrator's Findings of Fact and Reduces Interest Rate from 18% to 12% Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Mahanagar Gas Limited, awarded a work order to the respondent, M/s. Babulal Uttamchand & Co., for project management and construction o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SAFEMA Forfeiture Orders — Bank's Mortgage Rights Protected as Prior Encumbrance. The Court held that forfeiture under Section 7 of SAFEMA does not extinguish a prior bona fide mortgage created before the issuance of the show cause notice.

The Petitioner, Development Credit Bank Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 12th Mar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Central Warehousing Corporation Against Appointment of Arbitrator — Public Premises Act Does Not Override Arbitration Act. Disputes Over Unilateral Rate Revision and Lease Renewal Are Arbitrable Under Clause 16 of the Lease Agreement.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal by the Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) against a High Court order appointing an arbitrator to resolve disp...