Search Results for "Safeguard Duty"

1261 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1261 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Air India Challenging Rejection of Approval Application Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act — Withdrawal of Earlier Application and Reinstatement of Workman Bars Fresh Application for Approval of Dismissal Based on Same Misconduct.

The case involves a challenge by Air India Ltd. (the petitioner) against an order of the Presiding Officer of the National Industrial Tribunal at Mumb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recall of Disqualification in Grampanchayat Election Expense Case. Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi Under Section 14B(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioner, Balaji Ganpati Pawar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 23rd August 2008 passed by the Sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Writ Petition and Allows Trust's Petition in Service Law Dispute Under MEPS Act. Appointment Without Prior Approval Under Section 5 of the MEPS Act is Void, and Termination of Such Employee Does Not Require Compliance with Section 7.

The judgment involves two cross writ petitions arising from a dispute between an employee, Shatrughan Dada Kamble, and the Academy of Fine Arts & Craf...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation. Violation of Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India renders detention order invalid.

The petitioner, father of the detenu Chirag D. Shah, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a preven...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiffs in Leave and License Dispute — Defendant's Unconditional Appearance Precludes Leave to Defend. The Court held that the Defendant failed to raise any triable issues and was not entitled to leave to defend under Order XXXVII CPC.

The Plaintiffs, M/s. Mangla International Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed a Summary Suit under Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, a...