Search Results for "registration rules"

4377 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4377 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Gram Panchayat Employee Challenging Dismissal for Indecent Behaviour. Termination Order Upheld as Gram Panchayat Had Power to Dismiss Under Section 61(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Procedure of Natural Justice Was Followed.

The petitioner, Ashok Govindrao Sardar, was appointed as a Water Supply employee of Gram Panchayat Pimpalkhuta on 31 January 1986. On 12 December 2012...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes E-Auction Notice and Sale Certificate in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Violation of Rule 8(6) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002. Failure to Serve 30-Day Notice Before Auction Renders Sale Void.

The petitioners, Sri T.S. Nataraj, Sri Harsha N., and Smt. N. Seema, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India bef...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Plaintiff's Writ Petition in Specific Performance Suit — Rejection of Notice to Admit Documents Upheld. Trial Court's Discretion Under Order XII Rule 2 CPC Not Interfered With as Plaintiff Failed to Show That Documents Were Admitted or That Rejection Caused Prejudice.

The petitioner-plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of a contract for sale of property, seeking to direct the defendants to accept the bala...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Company Law Board's Power to Direct Issue of Shares Under Section 111 of Companies Act, 1956. The appeal raises the question whether the Board can order issuance of share certificates and rectification of register absent valid transfer documents.

This company appeal arose from an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) dated 14 January 2013 in Company Petition No. 23 of 2012. The CLB had directed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Atrocities Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Requirement. Alleged Offensive Language Not Uttered in Public View, Essential Ingredient Under Section 3(1)(ix) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Missing.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Dr. Rahul Dharmaraj Khade, a Sub Divisional Police Officer in Gadchiroli, challenging the r...