Bombay High Court Allows Trustees' Petition Challenging Charity Commissioner's Order in Public Trust Dispute — Appointment of New Trustees Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Compliance with Section 41A of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. The court held that the order was passed without giving an opportunity of hearing and without following the procedure under Section 41A, and directed the Charity Commissioner to pass a fresh order after hearing all parties.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 90
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, who were trustees of a public trust, challenged an order dated 30/09/2024 passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner, Nashik, appointing new trustees under Section 41A of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. The petitioners alleged that the order was passed without giving them an opportunity of hearing and in violation of principles of natural justice. The respondents, including the newly appointed trustees and the Charity Commissioner, opposed the petition, raising a preliminary objection that the petitioners had an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 70 of the Act. The court, after hearing the parties, held that the impugned order was passed in gross violation of natural justice as no show cause notice was given to the petitioners before appointing new trustees. The court further held that the availability of an alternative remedy is not an absolute bar to the maintainability of a writ petition when the order is passed without jurisdiction or in violation of natural justice. The court set aside the impugned order and directed the Charity Commissioner to pass a fresh order after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties. The court also directed that the newly appointed trustees shall not act as trustees and the earlier trustees shall continue to manage the trust affairs until a fresh order is passed.

Headnote

A) Public Trusts - Appointment of Trustees - Section 41A, Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Show Cause Notice - The Joint Charity Commissioner issued a show cause notice to the petitioners under Section 41A of the Act for alleged mismanagement and failure to file accounts, but without providing an opportunity of hearing or considering the petitioners' reply, proceeded to appoint new trustees. The court held that the order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice and without compliance with the mandatory requirements of Section 41A, which requires a show cause notice and an opportunity of hearing before any action is taken. (Paras 10-15)

B) Public Trusts - Alternative Remedy - Section 70, Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Maintainability of Writ Petition - The respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petitioners have an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 70 of the Act. The court held that the availability of an alternative remedy is not an absolute bar to the maintainability of a writ petition, especially when the impugned order is passed in violation of natural justice or without jurisdiction. Since the order was passed without giving an opportunity of hearing, the writ petition was held to be maintainable. (Paras 16-20)

C) Public Trusts - Appointment of Trustees - Section 47, Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Power of Charity Commissioner - The court examined the scope of Section 47, which empowers the Charity Commissioner to appoint trustees in certain circumstances. However, the court noted that the power under Section 47 must be exercised in accordance with the procedure prescribed under Section 41A, and any appointment made without following the due process is liable to be set aside. (Paras 21-25)

D) Public Trusts - Interim Relief - Section 80A, Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Status Quo - The court, while allowing the writ petitions, directed that the newly appointed trustees shall not act as trustees and the earlier trustees shall continue to manage the trust affairs until the Charity Commissioner passes a fresh order after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties. (Paras 26-30)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned order dated 30/09/2024 passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner appointing new trustees is sustainable in law, and whether the writ petitions are maintainable despite availability of alternative remedy under Section 70 of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petitions, set aside the impugned order dated 30/09/2024, and directed the Joint Charity Commissioner to pass a fresh order after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties. The court further directed that the newly appointed trustees shall not act as trustees and the earlier trustees shall continue to manage the trust affairs until a fresh order is passed.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Section 41A Maharashtra Public Trusts Act
  • 1950
  • Section 47 Maharashtra Public Trusts Act
  • Section 70 Maharashtra Public Trusts Act
  • Section 80A Maharashtra Public Trusts Act
  • maintainability of writ petition
  • alternative remedy
  • appointment of trustees
  • show cause notice
  • opportunity of hearing
  • reasoned order
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (06) 15

Writ Petition No. 13139 of 2025 and Writ Petition No. 853 of 2026

0000-00-00

Kisan Kalu Khatal and others

Usha Baburao Pawar and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the order of the Joint Charity Commissioner appointing new trustees under Section 41A of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950.

Remedy Sought

The petitioners sought quashing of the impugned order dated 30/09/2024 and a direction to the Charity Commissioner to pass a fresh order after giving an opportunity of hearing.

Filing Reason

The petitioners alleged that the impugned order was passed without giving them an opportunity of hearing and in violation of principles of natural justice.

Previous Decisions

The Joint Charity Commissioner passed the impugned order on 30/09/2024 appointing new trustees.

Issues

Whether the impugned order dated 30/09/2024 passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner appointing new trustees is sustainable in law. Whether the writ petitions are maintainable despite availability of alternative remedy under Section 70 of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners argued that the impugned order was passed without giving them an opportunity of hearing and in violation of principles of natural justice. The respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petitioners have an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 70 of the Act and therefore the writ petition is not maintainable.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the impugned order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice as no show cause notice was given to the petitioners before appointing new trustees. The court further held that the availability of an alternative remedy is not an absolute bar to the maintainability of a writ petition when the order is passed without jurisdiction or in violation of natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned order was passed without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. The availability of an alternative remedy is not an absolute bar to the maintainability of a writ petition. The order is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the Joint Charity Commissioner for fresh consideration.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 13139 of 2025 and Writ Petition No. 853 of 2026 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging the order dated 30/09/2024 passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner, Nashik, appointing new trustees under Section 41A of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. The respondents raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability. The court heard the matter and delivered the judgment.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950: 41A, 47, 70, 80A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Trustees' Petition Challenging Charity Commissioner's Order in Public Trust Dispute — Appointment of New Trustees Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Compliance with Section 41A of Maharashtra Public Trus...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Extrajudicial Confession. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as extrajudicial confession was not corroborated by any other evidence and the circumstances did not conclusively ...