Case Note & Summary
The petitioners, who were trustees of a public trust, challenged an order dated 30/09/2024 passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner, Nashik, appointing new trustees under Section 41A of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. The petitioners alleged that the order was passed without giving them an opportunity of hearing and in violation of principles of natural justice. The respondents, including the newly appointed trustees and the Charity Commissioner, opposed the petition, raising a preliminary objection that the petitioners had an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 70 of the Act. The court, after hearing the parties, held that the impugned order was passed in gross violation of natural justice as no show cause notice was given to the petitioners before appointing new trustees. The court further held that the availability of an alternative remedy is not an absolute bar to the maintainability of a writ petition when the order is passed without jurisdiction or in violation of natural justice. The court set aside the impugned order and directed the Charity Commissioner to pass a fresh order after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties. The court also directed that the newly appointed trustees shall not act as trustees and the earlier trustees shall continue to manage the trust affairs until a fresh order is passed.
Headnote
A) Public Trusts - Appointment of Trustees - Section 41A, Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Show Cause Notice - The Joint Charity Commissioner issued a show cause notice to the petitioners under Section 41A of the Act for alleged mismanagement and failure to file accounts, but without providing an opportunity of hearing or considering the petitioners' reply, proceeded to appoint new trustees. The court held that the order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice and without compliance with the mandatory requirements of Section 41A, which requires a show cause notice and an opportunity of hearing before any action is taken. (Paras 10-15) B) Public Trusts - Alternative Remedy - Section 70, Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Maintainability of Writ Petition - The respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petitioners have an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 70 of the Act. The court held that the availability of an alternative remedy is not an absolute bar to the maintainability of a writ petition, especially when the impugned order is passed in violation of natural justice or without jurisdiction. Since the order was passed without giving an opportunity of hearing, the writ petition was held to be maintainable. (Paras 16-20) C) Public Trusts - Appointment of Trustees - Section 47, Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Power of Charity Commissioner - The court examined the scope of Section 47, which empowers the Charity Commissioner to appoint trustees in certain circumstances. However, the court noted that the power under Section 47 must be exercised in accordance with the procedure prescribed under Section 41A, and any appointment made without following the due process is liable to be set aside. (Paras 21-25) D) Public Trusts - Interim Relief - Section 80A, Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Status Quo - The court, while allowing the writ petitions, directed that the newly appointed trustees shall not act as trustees and the earlier trustees shall continue to manage the trust affairs until the Charity Commissioner passes a fresh order after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties. (Paras 26-30)
Issue of Consideration
Whether the impugned order dated 30/09/2024 passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner appointing new trustees is sustainable in law, and whether the writ petitions are maintainable despite availability of alternative remedy under Section 70 of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950.
Final Decision
The court allowed the writ petitions, set aside the impugned order dated 30/09/2024, and directed the Joint Charity Commissioner to pass a fresh order after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties. The court further directed that the newly appointed trustees shall not act as trustees and the earlier trustees shall continue to manage the trust affairs until a fresh order is passed.
Law Points
- Natural justice
- Section 41A Maharashtra Public Trusts Act
- 1950
- Section 47 Maharashtra Public Trusts Act
- Section 70 Maharashtra Public Trusts Act
- Section 80A Maharashtra Public Trusts Act
- maintainability of writ petition
- alternative remedy
- appointment of trustees
- show cause notice
- opportunity of hearing
- reasoned order





