Search Results for "property title dispute"

4769 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4769 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the respondents (original plaintiffs) concerning land in Village...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Appeal in Revenue Recovery Dispute Against Company in Liquidation. Priority of secured creditor's claim under Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 upheld over State's statutory dues under Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

The case involves an appeal by the State of Karnataka and its officers against an order of the Company Judge dated 03.11.1998 in Company Application N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interim Application for Appointment of Court Receiver in Property Dispute Over Extra FSI Entitlement. Dispute concerns interpretation of Deed of Conveyance dated 27.09.1994 regarding additional area rights.

The Plaintiff, Erle Benedict Pereira, filed a suit seeking a declaration for extra FSI/additional area in respect of his entitlement under a registere...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Dismissal of Partition Suit Due to Disputed Parentage. The Appellant Challenges Trial Court's Finding on Relationship Based on Documentary Evidence Including School Certificates and Tax Receipts.

The regular first appeal was filed by the appellant, who was the plaintiff No.1 in the original suit, challenging the judgment and decree dated 22.09....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...