Search Results for "family requirement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "family requirement"

4123 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4123 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in Land Oustee Rehabilitation Case — Policy for Preferential Employment Does Not Exempt Selection Process. The Court held that the Railway Board's policy for preferential treatment to land oustees does not exempt them from undergoing the selection process; they must fulfill qualifications and be found suitable by recruitment committees.

1 Mar 2019

The dispute pertains to the rehabilitation of land oustees whose lands were acquired between 1984-85 and 1992-93 for the Sambalpur-Talcher Rail Link P...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in Land Oustee Rehabilitation Case — Policy for Preferential Employment Does Not Exempt Selection Process. The Court held that the Railway Board's policy for offering employment to displaced persons does not exempt them from undergoing the selection process; they must fulfill qualifications and be found suitable by recruitment committees.

1 Mar 2019

The dispute pertains to the rehabilitation of land oustees whose lands were acquired between 1984-85 and 1992-93 for the Sambalpur-Talcher Rail Link P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes 'C' Summary Report in Forgery Case — Directs Further Investigation Under Section 173(8) CrPC. Court holds that acceptance of summary report without considering FIR allegations and without examining witnesses vitiates the order, and that the informant has locus standi to challenge such acceptance.

16 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Avneesh Harvansh Singh, is the first informant who lodged an FIR on 22 September 2015 against respondent nos.2 to 6, who are co-truste...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Circular Restricting Pre-Litigation Counselling Under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Circular Discriminates Against Registered Service Providers and Deprives Women of Sound Advice, Violating Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

4 Sep 2015

The litigation arose from a Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation initiated by Dr. Jaya Sagade, a Professor of Law and Director of a service provider un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Passes Order on Interim Plea Over Yes Bank Management Rights Claimed by Heirs of Ashok Kapur. Core Issue Involves Interpretation of Articles of Association Regarding Heritability of Co-founder's Defined Privileges Following His Death in 2008 Mumbai Terror Attacks.

4 Jun 2015

The judgment deals with a Notice of Motion taken out by the legal heirs of late Ashok Kapur, co-founder of Yes Bank, who perished in the November 2008...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considered Challenge to Family Court Order Rejecting Amendment in Divorce Petition Under Article 227. The Core Issue Was Whether Post-Trial Amendment Seeking Property Sale Relief Constituted a Bar under Order VI Rule 17 CPC and Changed the Suit's Nature.

3 Sep 2025

The Bombay High Court heard a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Family Court, Mumbai, which had...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rules in Admiralty Jurisdiction Case: Cockette Marine Oil vs. OSV Beas Dolphin. Court Rejects Summary Judgment Amidst Insolvency Proceedings, Highlights Impact of IBC Moratorium on Maritime Claims.

23 Aug 2024

The Bombay High Court, under the Admiralty jurisdiction, considered an application for summary judgment filed by Cockette Marine Oil DMCC against OSV ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of HUF Property Sale Agreement Due to Plaintiff's Inequitable Conduct. Suppression of Material Facts and Inconsistent Pleadings Disentitle Equitable Relief Under Section 20 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

1 Mar 2024

The appeal arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 16th January 1980 executed by the defendant (Brij Bhushan Chaudha...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Due to Buyer's Acceptance of Refund During Pendency. Acceptance of Refund of Earnest Money Indicates Lack of Readiness and Willingness, Making Suit Not Maintainable Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

4 Apr 2025

The dispute arose from a suit for specific performance of an Agreement to Sell dated 25th January 2008, executed between the buyer (Respondent No.1) a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Civil Procedure Dispute Over Maintainability of Appeal Against Consent Decree. Court Held That Party to Suit Can Directly File First Appeal Under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Despite Section 96(3) Bar, as 1976 Amendment Introduced Order XLIII Rule 1-A(2) Preserving Such Remedy.

23 Apr 2025

The appeal arose from a dispute over land in Siddhpur, District Patan, involving multiple parties including the appellant Sakina Sultanali Sunesara an...

109 110 111 112 113

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)