Search Results for "Rule 12(5)"

1798 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1798 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Child Custody Dispute — Appeal Not Maintainable Under Order 43 Rule 1 CPC as Order is Not Appealable

The appellant, Smt. Savitha B.P., filed a suit (O.S. No. 14/2015) before the VI Additional Principal Family Judge at Bengaluru seeking a declaration t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reserves Judgment in Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Disappearance of Evidence. Accused Challenges Reliability of Circumstantial Evidence Including Test Identification Parade and Recovery Under Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 08.12.2020 passed by the Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No. 179/2014, convicting ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Petition Challenging Construction of Shopping Complex Within Prohibited Highway Area; Directions for Demolition Sought by Shirdi Councillors Based on Violation of Building Bye-Law and Lack of No-Objection Certificate.

The writ petition concerns a challenge to the construction of a shopping complex on land bearing survey no. 170/A2/1 abutting the Nagar-Manmad highway...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Section 34 Petition Against Foreign Award; Preliminary Objection Raised Pending Determination. Arbitration Agreement Existence and Enforcement of Foreign Award Under Part II Also Examined.

The dispute arose from a voyage charter party dated 13 September 2008 between Aurelia Reederei Eugen Friederich GmbH Schiffahrtsgesellschaft & Company...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Chamber Summons to Set Aside Abatement of Arbitration Petition and Condonation of Delay. Application Filed Under Order 22 Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to Bring Legal Representatives of Deceased Parties on Record.

The Chamber Summons was filed under Order 22 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to set aside the abatement of Arbitration Petition N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Jurisdiction of State Tax Officer Under IGST; Confiscation of Arecanut Goods Upheld. Court Holds that Section 4 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Does Not Require Separate Notification for Cross-Empowerment of State Officers.

The petitioner, a proprietorship concern dealing in arecanut, challenged a series of orders passed by the Commercial Tax Officer (Enforcement) under t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Jurisdiction in GST Confiscation Case. Commercial Tax Officer Holds Proper Officer Status Under IGST Act Due to Cross Empowerment; Notification Only Required for Exceptions.

The petitioner, a proprietorship concern engaged in trading arecanut, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 1338 OF 2020

...