Bombay High Court Adjudicates a Batch of Writ Petitions Filed Against National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. and Others. Petitions Relate to Claims Arising from Alleged Default of a Trading Member and the Role of Regulatory Bodies.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 109
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

WRIT PETITION NO.2392 OF 2003

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (12) 10

Writ Petition No.2392/2003, Writ Petition No.2735/2004, Writ Petition No.2764/2004, Writ Petition No.395/2004, Writ Petition No.1959/2004, Writ Petition No.1961/2004, Writ Petition No.2022/2004, Writ Petition No.2047/2004, Writ Petition No.2048/2004

Satya Prakash Aggarwal, Sandeep Aggarwal, Priya Doctor, Lachhmandas L.Narang, M/s.Amal Association, Heena Daswani, M/s.Rukhana Enterprises, Rakesh Damani, Sharda J.Rukhana

National Stock Exchange of India, National Securities Clearing Corporation Ltd., National Stock Exchange Investor Protection Fund Trust, Defaulter Committee- A/c.Bhavesh Dhirajlal Stock Broking Co.Ltd., Securities and Exchange Board of India, Bhavesh Dhirajlal Stock Broking Co. Ltd., Y.H.Malegam, S.Venkiteswaran, R.H.Patil, Ravi Narain, J.Ravichandran

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 1956:
  • Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Directs Amendment of Selection Notice for Delhi Higher Judicial Service Due to Illegal Change in Criteria. Introduction of Minimum Marks for Viva-Voce After Selection Process Commenced Held Impermissible.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Modifies Compensation for Temporary Workers in Labour Dispute — Upholds High Court's Ruling. The court found that the appellants were not regular employees and thus had limited rights under the law.