Search Results for "single scheme"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "single scheme"

4315 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4315 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Endorsement Rejecting SVLDRS Payment, Holds Limitation Extended Due to COVID-19 Supreme Court Orders. Payment made on 30.09.2020 under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, beyond notified deadline of 30.06.2020, held valid as Supreme Court took suo motu cognizance and extended limitation for all proceedings from 15.03.2020 till further orders.

20 Aug 2024

The writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of an endorsement dated 13.01.2022 and a directio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction Against Developer in Dispute Over Exhausted FSI and Conveyance Rights. Prima Facie, Developer's Attempt to Use TDR for Further Construction on Sector IV-A After Exhausting Consumable FSI Violates Cooperative Housing Societies' Right to Conveyance.

15 Apr 2015

The Bombay High Court dealt with cross-appeals arising from an interim injunction granted in a suit filed by cooperative housing societies against the...

High Court

NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2486 OF 2005

30 Nov 2005

The suit was filed by shareholders of Spice Jet Ltd, a domestic airline company formerly known as Modi Luft, which had undergone several ownership cha...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Grants Direction Dispensing with Section 101(2) Procedure in Reduction of Share Capital – Interpretation of 'Any Other Case' under Section 101(2) and Discretion of Court. The court held that where reduction does not involve diminution of liability in respect of unpaid share capital or payment to shareholders, Section 101(2) does not automatically apply, and the court has discretion to dispense with creditor objection procedure under Section 101(3) in special circumstances.

10 Feb 2005

The applicant, Rallis India Limited, a public limited company, had merged four loss-making subsidiaries, resulting in an accumulated debit balance of ...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Reimbursement Claim Under NHIS 2021 for Aorto Bi-Iliac Bypass Surgery Despite Cashless Denial — Insurance Company and TPA Directed to Pay Rs.2,72,406/- with Interest. Court Held That Denial of Cashless Facility Does Not Extinguish Reimbursement Entitlement Under the Scheme.

9 Jun 2026

The petitioner, P. Ravi, a Head Constable serving in the Tamil Nadu Police Department, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against High Court's Mandamus to Consider OTS Application. Court Holds That No Writ of Mandamus Can Be Issued to Direct a Bank to Grant One Time Settlement Benefit Under Article 226 of the Constitution.

15 Dec 2021

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court which, in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, iss...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Employer Seeking Exclusion of Retired Railway Employees from EPF Coverage. Retired Employees Who Withdrew Full GPF Accumulations Are Not 'Excluded Employees' Under Paragraph 2(f) of the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952, as the Term 'Fund' Refers Only to the EPF Fund Established Under the Act.

26 Mar 2019

The case involves an appeal by Modern Transportation Consultation Services Pvt. Ltd. and its director against the judgment of the Division Bench of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Slum Rehabilitation Area Declaration Where No Show Cause Notice Was Issued. The Court Examines Whether Principles of Natural Justice Require Opportunity of Hearing Before Section 3C(1) Declaration Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

11 May 2011

This writ petition was filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the declaration of certain property as a Slum Rehabilitation Area under Section 3C(1...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for POCSO Victim Under NALSA Scheme — Inadequate Compensation of Rs. 1,00,000 Enhanced to Rs. 10,50,000. The court held that the NALSA Scheme mandates minimum compensation of Rs. 7,00,000 for sexual assault victims, which can be enhanced by 50%.

27 Jun 2023

The appellant, Smt. Lalitha, mother of a minor victim of sexual assault, filed an appeal under Section 372 CrPC challenging the adequacy of compensati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Eviction Notices under Slum Act in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. Petitioners Challenged Eviction Notices Issued under Sections 33 and 38 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, Alleging Lack of Section 3C(1) Declaration.

26 Apr 2006

The matter arose from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by Om-Sai Darshan Cooperative Housing Society (Proposed) an...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)