Search Results for "municipal demolition"

429 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 429 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Demolition of Illegal Constructions on Water Bodies in Tamil Nadu. Court Directs Removal of Encroachments and Restoration of Water Bodies to Protect Environment and Public Interest Under Public Trust Doctrine and Article 21.

This batch of writ petitions was filed by various individuals and associations challenging the demolition of constructions on water bodies and river b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition and Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Municipal Notice Case — Lack of Delegation of Powers Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act. Notice Issued by Assistant Engineer Without Authorization from Commissioner Held Invalid Under Section 381 of the Act.

The petitioner, Kishanlal Udaylal Jain, through his power of attorney holder, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Against Demolition Without Notice Under Section 354 of MMC Act. Municipal Corporation Directed to Restore Possession and Follow Due Process Before Demolition of Alleged Unauthorised Structures.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Suman Devidas Somani and Ambika Kutty against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Against National Sports Club of India Construction, Upholding Environmental and Municipal Permissions. Court finds no violation of CRZ or heritage regulations and rejects allegations of illegal construction as motivated by private interests.

The petitioner, Society for Promotion of Equality, Awareness and Rights (SPEAR), filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court seeki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Hawking Activities on Footpaths in Nariman Point and Churchgate Areas. Court Holds That Hawking Is a Fundamental Right Under Article 19(1)(g) Subject to Reasonable Restrictions, and That Municipal Authorities Have Discretion to Designate Hawking Zones.

The petitioners, a group of residents and welfare associations from Nariman Point and Churchgate areas in Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (...