Search Results for "land reforms compensation"

184 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 184 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Section 10A(2)(c) of MMDR Act and Rule 8(4) of MCR Rules, 2016. Petition Seeks Execution of Mining Lease Deed and Challenges Orders of Union and State Governments.

The petitioner, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 (originally ABG Cement Ltd., later Vadraj Cement Ltd.), filed a writ petition befor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Considers Civil Revision on Willful Default in Rent under Hyderabad Houses (Rent, Eviction and Lease) Control Act, 1954. Tenant Challenges Concurrent Eviction Orders, Arguing Joint Family Tenancy and Non-Willful Default.

The matter arose from a civil revision application filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, challenging concurrent decis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification. Petitioners Alleged Notification Ultra Vires Article 246 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, Seeking to Quash Demand Notices.

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, corporations, and individuals, including National ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Decides Revenue's Wealth Tax Appeals Involving Definition of 'Assets'. The Appeals Challenge ITAT Orders Regarding Assessment Years 1999-2000 to 2004-05 under Section 2(ea) of Wealth Tax Act, 1957.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of Wealth Tax Appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 27-A of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, against the order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Water Channel Dispute — No Substantial Question of Law. Concurrent findings of fact by lower courts regarding right to draw water from a channel cannot be interfered with under Section 100 of CPC unless perverse.

The dispute arose between neighbouring landholders regarding a water channel that existed on the northern side of the plaintiff's suit schedule proper...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Writ Petition Challenging Administrative Tribunal Orders in Mundkarial Dispute. Key Issue Whether Mamlatdar Had Jurisdiction to Determine Mundkarial Rights When Reference Was Made Under Section 32 of the Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975.

The litigation originated from two civil suits filed in 1992 by M/s. Suvarn Rajaram Bandekar Discretionary Trust against one Armando Cardozo for remov...