Search Results for "exclusion"

331 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 331 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Kerala High Court’s Decision: Syrang’s Licence Holder Ineligible for Lascar Post. Statutory Qualifications Prevail Over Higher Competency – Non-Joinder of Necessary Party Fatal to Appellant’s Case.

Essential Qualifications: Statutory rules prescribing specific qualifications cannot be diluted by executive interpretation (Paras 20–22). Equality ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Commercial Wisdom of CoC in DHFL Insolvency, Sets Aside NCLAT’s Interference in Resolution Plan. Recoveries from Avoidance Applications Under Section 66 IBC to Benefit SRA; FD Holders’ Claims Dismissed

Commercial Wisdom of CoC – The Supreme Court reaffirmed the paramount status of the Committee of Creditors’ (CoC) commercial wisdom in approving ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Share Valuation, Awards Interest at 6% Pre-Decree and 9% Post-Decree in Decades-Old Dispute. Balancing Equity and Commercial Realities: SC Modifies Interest Rates in Rajasthan State Mines Share Acquisition Case

Valuation of Shares – The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court’s valuation of shares at ₹640 per share, rejecting the State’s objections. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility Criteria for Food Safety Officers: Master’s Degree in Relevant Subjects Valid for Appointment. Court Rules in Favor of Appellants, Quashes High Court’s Decision on FSO Qualifications

The term “degree” under Section 22(3) of the UGC Act includes Bachelor’s, Master’s, and Doctorate degrees, and any restriction to exclude Mast...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside NCDRC Order : No Privity of Contract Between Parties, Respondent Not a ‘Consumer’ Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Court Holds No Tripartite Agreement Proven, Respondent Not Entitled to Compensation Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986

Privity of Contract Essential for Consumer Status: The Court reiterated that for a person to qualify as a ‘consumer’ under the CPA, t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Rules on Advocate Appearances and Vakalatnama Compliance in Court Proceedings. Supreme Court Bars Unauthorized Advocate Appearances, Reinforces Accountability in Legal Practice

The Supreme Court, in its judgment dated 20.09.2024, had directed that only authorized advocates could mark their appearances in court, and the Advoca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court quashed rejection of technical bid by respondent due to an unreasonable and arbitrary interpretation of tender conditions, directing re-evaluation of the financial bid. Arbitrary Interpretation of Tender Conditions

Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 14–Judicial Review in Tender Matters – Constitutional Courts should interfere only if tender decisions are...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Interim Application, Holds Limitation and Due Diligence as Key Issues in Share Recovery Suit. Summary Judgment Denied in Share Dispute Due to Limitation and Need for Oral Evidence

Summary Judgment under Order XIII-A of the CPC: The Court held that a summary judgment can only be granted if the Defendant has no real prospect of d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of Select List for Constable Recruitment Due to Irregularities. Recruitment Process Cancelled Due to Violation of Reservation Policy and Lack of Fair Representation – Supreme Court Reiterates Doctrine of Proportionality and Wednesbury Unasonableness

The doctrine of Proportionality: The Court held that the decision to cancel the entire recruitment process was proportionate to the gravity of the irr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Decree for Specific Performance, Directs Execution of Possession in Favor of Appellants. Collusion Between Vendors and Respondents to Frustrate Decree Cannot Defeat the Fruits of Justice

Specific Performance and Possession – The Supreme Court held that the appellants were entitled to specific performance of the sale agreement and po...