Search Results for "comparable sale method"

261 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 261 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Valuation Case Due to Incorrect Adoption of Highest Price. Valuation Must Be Based on Most Conservative Price Under Rule 6(b)(i) of Central Excise Rules, 1994, as Per Precedents on Normal Wholesale Cash Price.

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal filed by the revenue against an order of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows State and Claimant Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Determined at Rs. 30 per sq.m. with 30% Deduction for Development. Court applies belting method and deducts development cost for large land parcel acquired for Nhava-Sheva water supply.

The case involves two appeals arising from the same award dated 30th September 1989 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Raigad at Alibag in La...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Royalty for Court Receiver's Property in License Dispute. Court modifies Receiver's order fixing royalty at Rs.45,000 per month and enhances to Rs.1,50,000 per month based on valuation report and market rates.

The plaintiff filed a chamber summons seeking modification of the Court Receiver's order dated 24 August 2010 fixing royalty at Rs.45,000 per month fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal by Goa Housing Board Reducing Land Compensation from ₹300 to ₹150 per sq. metre. Large Agricultural Land Acquisition Requires 50% Deduction for Development Charges Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves an appeal by the Goa Housing Board against the Judgment and Award dated 6th December 2011 passed by the Reference Court under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Multiple Appeals and Cross-Objections Challenging Compensation Awards in Land Acquisition Matters. The Court Determined Market Value of Lands Acquired for a Minor Irrigation Tank in Kakhandaki Village, Bijapur District.

In the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, a conglomeration of appeals and cross-objections under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 challenged the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Executive Engineer in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhanced from Rs.1,57,500 to Rs.10,00,000 per Hectare. Market Value Determination Based on Comparable Sale Deed and Potential Use of Land for Orange Cultivation Upheld Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 11.02.2020 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Amravati (reference court) in a land ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Land Acquisition for Minor Irrigation Tank — Market Value Determined at Rs. 1,50,000 per Acre with 30% Solatium and 12% Additional Market Value. Comparable Sales Method Applied Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to Fix Enhanced Compensation.

The appellants, whose land was acquired for construction of a minor irrigation tank, challenged the judgment and award of the Reference Court dated 18...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Compensation Enhancement for Acquired Land in Malad. Reference Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Seeks Higher Compensation Than Awarded by SLAO.

These proceedings arose from the acquisition of land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The acquired property comprised land bearing Survey No. 91 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears and Decides Batch of Appeals Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Regarding Compensation for Kakhandaki Village Lands. The Court Examined Market Value Determinations Made by the Reference Court Under Sections 18 and 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

Background: A batch of appeals and cross objections were filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 189...