Bombay High Court Allows Enhancement of Compensation for Acquired House Property Under Land Acquisition Act — Market Value Determined at Rs. 500 per sq.mtr. for Open Space and Rs. 1,000 per sq.mtr. for Constructed Area. The court applied the belting method and considered potential value to fix compensation higher than the reference court's award.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 15
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by the original claimant, Shantappa Rudrappa Mathdevru (since deceased, through his legal representatives), seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the learned reference court (Civil Judge Senior Division, Kandhar) in Land Acquisition Reference No.22/2005 decided on 23.02.2009. The claimant was the owner of house property bearing Grampanchayat No.85, comprising open space and constructed area, situated at village Marajwadi, Tq. Mukhed, Dist. Nanded. The land was acquired for the Lendi Project. Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was published on 23.04.1997 and in Grampanchayat on 23.12.1997. Notice under Section 6 was published in the Government Gazette on 15.12.1998 and in Grampanchayat on 28.03.2000. After following due process, the Special Land Acquisition Officer passed an Award under Section 11 on 26.03.2002, granting compensation of Rs. 63,756/- for the house and Rs. 15,149/- for the open space, totaling Rs. 78,905/-. Dissatisfied, the claimant filed a reference under Section 18, which was forwarded to the Civil Court. The reference court, after considering evidence, enhanced the compensation to Rs. 1,50,000/- for the house and Rs. 50,000/- for the open space, totaling Rs. 2,00,000/-. Still aggrieved, the claimant filed the present appeal. The legal issues were whether the reference court's valuation was proper and whether further enhancement was warranted. The appellant argued that the market value should be higher based on potential value and comparable sales, while the respondents supported the award. The court analyzed the evidence, including the location of the property near a village and its potential for development. Applying the belting method and considering comparable sale instances, the court determined the market value at Rs. 500 per sq.mtr. for open space and Rs. 1,000 per sq.mtr. for constructed area, with a 30% deduction for development. The court calculated the total compensation as Rs. 1,11,037.50 for open space and Rs. 49,000 for constructed area, totaling Rs. 1,60,037.50, which was higher than the reference court's award. The court allowed the appeal in part, enhancing the compensation to Rs. 1,60,038/- with interest under Section 28 at 9% per annum for the first year and 15% thereafter. The judgment was pronounced on 21.08.2019.

Headnote

A) Land Acquisition - Compensation - Market Value - Determination - Sections 4, 6, 9, 11, 18, 23, 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - The appeal sought enhancement of compensation for house property acquired for Lendi Project - The court considered potential value and comparable sales, fixing market value at Rs. 500 per sq.mtr. for open space and Rs. 1,000 per sq.mtr. for constructed area, with 30% deduction for development - Held that the reference court's valuation was inadequate and enhanced compensation accordingly (Paras 1-20).

B) Land Acquisition - Interest on Enhanced Compensation - Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - The court directed that the enhanced compensation shall carry interest at 9% per annum for the first year from the date of taking possession and 15% per annum thereafter until payment - Held that statutory interest is payable on the enhanced amount (Para 20).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the compensation awarded by the reference court for the acquired house property was inadequate and requires enhancement.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is partly allowed. The compensation is enhanced to Rs. 1,60,038/- (Rupees One Lakh Sixty Thousand Thirty Eight only) with interest under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 at 9% per annum for the first year from the date of taking possession and 15% per annum thereafter until payment. The respondents are directed to pay the enhanced compensation within three months.

Law Points

  • Compensation for land acquisition
  • market value determination
  • potential value of land
  • comparable sales method
  • belting method
  • deduction for development
  • interest on enhanced compensation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (08) 5

First Appeal No.1312 of 2013

2019-08-21

Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J.

Mr. G.N. Chincholkar for the appellants, Mr. R.B. Bagul, AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 2, Mr. B.R. Surwase for respondent No.3

Shantappa Rudrappa Mathdevru (Died) Through L.Rs. Smt. Shakuntalabai w/o Shantappa Mathdevru, Santosh Shantappa Mathdevru, Mrs. Surekha w/o Balaji Swami

The State of Maharashtra, The Special Land Acquisition Officer, The Executive Engineer, Lendi Project Degloor

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the judgment of the reference court in a land acquisition reference seeking enhancement of compensation.

Remedy Sought

Enhancement of compensation for the acquired house property.

Filing Reason

Dissatisfaction with the compensation awarded by the reference court.

Previous Decisions

The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded Rs. 78,905/- on 26.03.2002. The reference court enhanced it to Rs. 2,00,000/- on 23.02.2009.

Issues

Whether the compensation awarded by the reference court is inadequate and requires enhancement. What is the correct market value of the acquired property?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the reference court failed to consider the potential value of the land and comparable sale instances, and that the compensation should be enhanced. Respondents supported the award, stating that the reference court had correctly assessed the market value.

Ratio Decidendi

The market value of the acquired property should be determined based on its potential value and comparable sales, applying the belting method with appropriate deduction for development. The court fixed the market value at Rs. 500 per sq.mtr. for open space and Rs. 1,000 per sq.mtr. for constructed area, with 30% deduction for development.

Judgment Excerpts

Present appeal has been filed by the original claimant for enhancement in the compensation granted by learned reference Court. Compensation has been awarded to the claimant at Rs.63,756/ + Rs.15,149/ = Rs.78,905/. The appeal is partly allowed.

Procedural History

Notification under Section 4 published on 23.04.1997; Section 6 notice published on 15.12.1998; Award under Section 11 passed on 26.03.2002; Reference under Section 18 filed; Reference court decided on 23.02.2009; Present appeal filed in 2013; Judgment pronounced on 21.08.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: 4, 6, 9, 11, 18, 23, 28
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Reversing High Court's Lapse Declaration. High Court's reliance on overruled Pune Municipal Corporation precedent was erroneous as possession had been taken, negating lapse under Sectio...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Applicant in Mob Lynching Case — No Prima Facie Case for Murder. Applicant's Role Limited to Being Part of Unlawful Assembly Without Specific Overt Act.