Search Results for "Vague Averments"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Vague Averments"

822 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 822 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Ex-Parte Injunction in Development Agreement Dispute — No Prima Facie Case for Specific Performance as Agreement Was Only a Draft. The court held that a draft agreement shared for suggestions does not constitute a concluded contract, and the balance of convenience favored the defendant-owner under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC.

20 Mar 2023

The applicant, Jatin Jitendra Rasiklal Shah, was the original defendant No.1 and owner of Nazul Plot No. 2/1 in Amravati. The respondent No.1, Shardul...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Probationer Without Inquiry - Appointment Order Set Aside as Termination Stigmatic and Without Opportunity of Hearing. The court held that termination of a probationer based on unsatisfactory performance without inquiry is invalid when the order casts a stigma.

28 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Shailesh Sadanand Raut, applied for the post of Works Assistant in the Public Works Department (PWD) of the Government of Goa pursuant...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Respondents in Contempt for Breach of Injunction Order. Resolutions Increasing Authorised Capital and Alloting Shares While Restrained from Exercising Rights on Shares Amount to Wilful Disobedience.

15 Nov 2006

The appeal arose from Suit No.3121 of 2004, where the appellants (original plaintiffs, Gopal L. Raheja & Anr.) claimed that the respondents (original ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Regular First Appeals Against Trial Court Decree in Suit for Declaration and Permanent Injunction. Property Dispute Among Multiple Parties Pertaining to Immovable Property Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

1 Oct 2024

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Company Winding Up Petition Under Companies Act, 1956 Due to Lack of Bona Fide Dispute. Concurrent Findings Upheld as Appellant's Defence Was Vague and Non-Specific in Reply to Statutory Notice Under Sections 433(e) and 434.

6 Apr 2021

The dispute arose from a transaction where the respondent, a manufacturer of acrylic yarn, supplied material on credit to the appellant. The appellant...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Maintainability of Suit on Valuation for Court Fee and Jurisdiction in Patent Ownership Dispute. Suit Valuation at Plaintiff's Discretion Under Sections 8 and 9 Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959, Cannot Be Overruled Absent Evidence of Incorrect Valuation.

20 Mar 2012

The suit was filed by Jer Rutton Kavasmaneck and another against Gharda Chemicals Ltd. and others seeking declarations, injunctions, and accounts rega...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Averments. Directors Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Allegations of Their Role in Company's Day-to-Day Affairs.

21 Jun 2019

The petitioners, who were directors of the accused company, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Additional Evidence in Appeal Against Order Refusing Revocation of Administrator. Order XLI Rule 27 CPC requires strict proof of due diligence for admitting additional evidence at appellate stage.

27 Sep 2012

The case involves a Chamber Summons taken out by Ferani Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (the appellant) under Order XLI, Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Condoned 6110 Days Delay in Filing Application to Set Aside Abatement and Bring Legal Heirs in Second Appeal — Sufficient Cause Shown for Death of Original Appellant and Continuous Litigation. The court held that the term 'sufficient cause' under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 should be liberally construed to advance substantial justice, and condoned the delay subject to costs.

11 Feb 2026

The present judgment arises from a Second Appeal No. 17 of 2003 pending before the Gujarat High Court. The original appellant, Vira Meru Jotwa, had fi...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Interim Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Prima Facie Finds Interim Award Passed Without Considering Entire Pleadings and Grants Stay of Enforcement.

7 Aug 2019

The matter involved two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an interim award dated...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)