Search Results for "Tahsildar Office"

1091 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1091 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cancellation of Earthquake Affected Person Certificate — Tahsildar Cannot Review Civil Court Decree. Circular Issued by Collector Cannot Override Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956.

The petitioner, originally the biological son of Shankar Ramu Pawar, was given in adoption to Lalu Shivram Jadhav and his wife on 18.04.2022 through a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Secret information not reduced to writing and sent to superior officer, and accused not informed of right to be searched before Magistrate or Gazetted Officer, leading to acquittal.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by three appellants convicted under Sections 20 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Demolition of Illegal Construction in Streamlet Under Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965. Court Directs Municipal Council to Act Independently of Tahsildar's Letter and Enforce Law Against Unauthorized Building.

The petitioner, Kalidas Bhagwantrao Wadekar, a resident of Chakan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a dire...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Directs Tahsildar to Consider Representation for Release of Land from Pada in Land Revenue Case. The court held that revenue authorities must consider representations for release of forfeited land within a reasonable time under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

The petitioner, M.G. Suresh, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the Tahsildar, Shiva...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Revisional Order in Land Conversion Dispute — Petitioner's Right to Change Land Use Upheld. Deputy Commissioner's Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

The petitioner, Satish Hegde, purchased four acres of land in Sy.No.58 (New Sy.No.141) at Singrahalli Village, Devanahalli Taluk, under a registered s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty for Excavation of Earth Without Permission in Construction Project. Excavation for Foundation Laying and Backfilling Does Not Amount to 'Illegal Excavation' Under Section 48(7) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioner, M/s BGR Energy Systems Limited, was awarded a contract by Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Limited (MAHAGENCO) for construct...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shashikant Piraji Sonawane, was convicted by the Special Judge for Greater Bombay under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Against Government Officials in Land Revenue Act Case — No Prima Facie Case for Abetment of Misappropriation. Section 192-A of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 requires specific allegations of abetment; mere official duty performance does not attract criminal liability.

The judgment concerns four criminal petitions and a writ petition filed by government officials seeking quashing of FIR in Crime No.18/2014 registered...