KAHC010138832018_1
14 Jan 2019...
Search Results for "State Government revision"
3704 result(s) found
Found 3704 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Repugnancy Between Section 28A of Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 and Section 299 of Indian Succession Act, 1925. Petitioner Contends That District Court Lacked Jurisdiction to Hear Appeal from Probate Revocation.
14 Feb 2014The writ petition was filed by Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, challenging the constitutional validity of S...
- 16
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Acquits Revision Petitioner in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Renders Conviction Unsustainable.
24 Jun 2022The case pertains to a criminal revision petition filed by M. Ajithkumar, the proprietor of Swasthik Trading Company, challenging his conviction under...
- 84
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Sales Tax Assessment on Inter-State Movement of Brahmos Missiles for Job Work. The Court Examines Whether Transfer of Goods for Warhead Integration Constitutes Inter-State Sale Under Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.
10 Jan 2017The judgment, though incomplete in its provided excerpt, deals with a writ petition filed by BrahMos Aerospace Private Limited, a joint venture betwee...
- 24
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Criminal Revision Petitions in Cheating Case — Conviction Under Section 420 IPC Upheld. Court finds concurrent findings of fact based on credible evidence and no grounds for interference under revisional jurisdiction.
27 May 2020The case involves three criminal revision petitions filed by the petitioners against their conviction under Section 420 read with Section 34 of the In...
- 112
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Clubbed Petitions Challenging Ward Reservation Notifications in Municipal Elections. Petitioners Allege Illegal Reservation, Seek Quashing of Notifications and Direction for General Category Reservation.
14 Jan 2019The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging not...
- 58
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Directs Implementation of Second National Judicial Pay Commission Recommendations for District Judiciary — Upholds Uniform Pay, Pension, and Service Conditions as Essential for Judicial Independence. The Court held that financial security and economic independence of judicial officers are part of the basic structure of the Constitution, and directed uniform pay revision with a multiplier of 2.81 and pension at 50% of last drawn pay.
19 May 2023The Supreme Court, in a writ petition filed by the All India Judges Association, addressed the implementation of the Second National Judicial Pay Comm...
- 593
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Validates Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes in Landmark Judgment. Upholding Equality Within Equality: Supreme Court Endorses State's Power to Sub-Classify Scheduled Castes for Targeted Reservation.
1 Aug 2024The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has upheld the constitutionality of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservati...
- 491
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...
- 63
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Reviews Its Own Judgment That Struck Down Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearance Notifications Under Environment (Protection) Act. Review Petition Seeks Recall Citing Overlooked Binding Precedents.
1 Jan 1970Background: The present matter is a review petition arising from the Supreme Court's judgment in Vanashakti v. Union of India, dated 16 May 2025, whic...
- 58
