CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7370 OF 2026
1 Jan 1970The present Civil Appeal arises from a suit for declaration of ownership of agricultural properties based on a Will dated 20.04.2018, allegedly execut...
Search Results for "Section 135 Indian Contract Act"
379 result(s) found
Found 379 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Grants Leave to Appeal Against High Court Order Upholding CLB's Condonation of Delay in Share Transmission Registration. Core Issue Revolves Around Interpretation of Section 58(3) of Companies Act, 2013 and the CLB's Inherent Powers to Apply Limitation Act Provisions.
1 Jan 1970The dispute centered on the condonation of a 249-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 58(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 before the Company Law B...
- 41
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Arbitration Petitions Challenging Arbitral Awards in Real Estate Development Dispute — Awards Dated 22-23 April 2022 in Favour of Claimants. Court considers whether awards passed under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in relation to allotment and development of plots in Arrow City Manhattan Project are liable to be set aside, especially given arbitrator's adoption of findings from Claim No.5 across other claims.
21 Feb 2024The Bombay High Court heard a batch of connected arbitration petitions filed by Arrow Engineering Limited challenging arbitral awards passed in favour...
- 12
High Court
- 42
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Addresses Requirement of Leave Under Section 446 of Companies Act, 1956 and Applicability of IBC Moratorium in Admiralty Proceedings. Court Considers Whether Admiralty Suits Are Affected by Company Liquidation Under Section 446 of Companies Act, 1956 and Moratorium Under Section 14 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 in Light of Competing Claims of Maritime Creditors and Operation of Insolvency Law.
19 May 2020The proceedings arose from multiple admiralty suits filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, wherein orders of arrest of defendant vessels...
- 29
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Dispute — Civil Suit Barred Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Shareholder's Allegations of Fraud Do Not Override Statutory Bar When Secured Assets Are Involved.
15 Oct 2024The petitioner, Shashikant Gangar, a shareholder and director of Libox Chem (India) Private Limited (respondent no. 2), filed a writ petition challeng...
- 742
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition Against Guarantor Company Due to Bona Fide Dispute and Pendency of DRT Proceedings. Court Finds That Existence of Disputes Regarding Validity of Guarantee and Pending Recovery Proceedings Before DRT Render the Petition Not Maintainable Under Companies Act, 1956.
23 Jun 2016The petitioner, SICOM Ltd., a financial institution, filed a winding-up petition against the respondent, Entertainment World Developers Pvt. Ltd., und...
- 30
High Court
Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Arbitration Petition Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Petition Challenged Interim Measures Granted by Arbitral Tribunal in Terminalling Service Agreement Dispute.
6 May 2016The petitioner, Gujarat Chemical Port Terminal Co. Ltd., constructed port terminal facilities at Dahej, Gujarat, including tanks for handling and expo...
- 24
Supreme Court
Presidential Reference Made to Supreme Court Seeks Advisory Opinion on Telecom Licences and Spectrum Allocation Policies. Reference Under Article 143(1) Recites Historical Grant of Licences from 1994 to 2008 Including First-Come-First-Served and Revenue Share Regimes.
12 Apr 2012Background: The President of India made a reference under Article 143(1) of the Constitution on 12.04.2012, seeking the advisory opinion of the Suprem...
- 78
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Disqualifying Related Parties of Corporate Debtors from Submitting Resolution Plans. The Court holds that the disqualification under Section 29A(c) applies to persons acting jointly or in concert with a disqualified person, and that the provision is not retrospective in operation.
3 Oct 2024The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment on the interpretation and validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016...
- 480
