Search Results for "Section 105 CPC"

411 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 411 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in International Commercial Arbitration. Parties Impliedly Excluded Part I of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Agreeing to ICC Rules and Zambian Law.

The petitioner, Konkola Copper Mines (PLC), a company registered in Zambia, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Two Regular First Appeals Under Section 96 CPC Against Common Judgment in Suits for Declaration, Injunction, Partition, and Dissolution of Partnership — Property Dispute Involving Sites in Mysore and Bangalore

The Regular First Appeals RFA No.37/2003 and RFA No.84/2003 were filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the common j...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition Against Delhi High Court’s Unconditional Stay of Money Decree Under Order XLI Rule 5 CPC. Execution of Trademark Infringement Money Decree Stayed Without Deposit Pending Appeal, Upheld by Apex Court Citing Sufficient Cause.

The dispute arose from a civil suit instituted by Lifestyle Equities C.V. and anor, claiming to be the proprietor of the Beverly Hills Polo Club trade...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Registration and Summoning Orders in Multiple Cases Under Karnataka Police Act Section 78(3). Petitioner Seeks Quashing of Criminal Proceedings Alleging Procedural Irregularities.

The petitioner approached the High Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to set aside the orders registering crimin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Declaration and Injunction. Court holds that the trial court erred in rejecting the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC without considering the plaintiffs' claim of possession and the pending amendment application.

The appellants, plaintiffs in Special Civil Suit No. 220/1993/A, filed a suit for declaration and injunction in 1993, claiming ownership and possessio...