Search Results for "Rule 4(20)"

1240 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1240 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute — Allegations of Cheating and Criminal Intimidation Not Made Out. Transaction Between Complainant and Service Centre Was Essentially Civil, No Criminal Intent Established Under Sections 420, 506 IPC.

The applicants, who are accused in FIR No.7/2015 registered at MIDC Police Station, Ahmednagar for offences under Sections 420 and 506 read with Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Charges Against Advocate in Forgery Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence — Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC Not Attracted as No Specific Allegation of Dishonest Inducement or Forgery Against Applicant.

The applicant, Mohan Premnath Kothimbire, an advocate practicing in Additional Sessions Court, Omerga, was arrayed as accused No.7 in R.C.C. No.11/200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Against Sub-Registrar in Forgery Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. Petitioner's Role as Registering Authority Not Sufficient to Attract Sections 420, 465, 468, 471 IPC Without Evidence of Intent or Knowledge.

The petitioner, Bhuvaneshwar S/o Laxman Masamatti, was working as a Sub-Registrar at Jamakhandi. He was arrayed as accused No.6 in Crime No.24/2020 re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Company and Directors in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Lack of CBI Jurisdiction. Registration of FIR Without Involvement of Public Servant and Based on RBI Master Circular Held Without Authority, and Section 120B IPC Cannot Apply Standalone.

The case involved Associate Lumbers Private Limited and its directors, who had availed loan facilities from Corporation Bank (later Union Bank of Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Limitation Bar and Lack of Debt Evidence. Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Dismissed as Notice Served on 10.12.2013 and Complaint Filed on 20.01.2014, Beyond 30 Days.

The applicants, Vishnu Pavse and others, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheating Case Due to Purely Civil Nature of Dispute — Non-Payment of Dues Does Not Attract Criminal Breach of Trust Under Section 406 IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. and its office bearers against the order of the Allahabad High Court which h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Freezing of Properties by Investigating Officer in Bank Fraud Case — Lack of Statutory Authority Under M.P.I.D. Act. Investigating Officer Cannot Freeze Immovable Properties Without Legal Provision; Bail Conditions Already Complied With.

The petitioner, Vijaykumar alias Vijay S/o Sitaram Dandanaik, was the chairman of Vasantdada Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd, Osmanabad. He was arrested in c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petition for De-freezing of Bank Account in Alleged Crypto Currency Fraud Case. Petitioner Claims Innocence and Non-Compliance with Section 102 Cr.P.C.

The petitioner, a businessman engaged in oil trading, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Section 409 IPC Case Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Sanction — Petitioner Acquitted of Criminal Breach of Trust by Public Servant as Trial Not Commenced Even After 16 Years and Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Was Not Obtained.

The petitioner, Shri Babruwan Kinalkar, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay ...