Search Results for "Prosecutrix Testimony"

350 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 350 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and SC/ST Act Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape of Minor Tribal Girl Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant-accused, Arvindbhai @ Bhadabhai Shanabhai @ Shankarbhai Chauhan, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and SC/ST Act Case Due to Material Contradictions and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape of Minor Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant-accused, Arvindbhai @ Bhadabhai Shanabhai @ Shankarbhai Chauhan, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in Rape and Atrocities Case — Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376, 452, 323, 506 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act Upheld.

The appellant, Ramdas alias Ramkisan s/o Nagnath Hulgunde, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 376, 452, 323, 506 of the Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Prosecution Case.

The appellant, Ashpak Lalmohammad Mohammad Ansari, was convicted under Section 376(2)(g) of the Indian Penal Code for gang rape and sentenced to ten y...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Age Discrepancy. Consent-Based Sexual Relationship Not Rape Under Section 375 IPC as Promise of Marriage Was Not False from Inception.

The appellant, Amit Shende, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, for offences under Section 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Gang Rape, Criminal Trespass, and Criminal Intimidation — Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical and Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376(2)(g), 448, 506(II) read with Section 34 IPC confirmed.

The case arises from an incident during the intervening night of 27/08/1991 and 28/08/1991 at about 1:00 a.m., when the appellants Dinesh Tukaram Tela...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor in Rape Case — Medical Evidence and Victim Testimony Corroborate Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 376 IPC for rape of a 13-year-old girl in a shop confirmed, with sentence of 7 years RI and fine.

The appellant, Arvind Bhagwant Datal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur, for offences under Sections 376 and 342 of the Indian Pen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Allegations.

The case involves three criminal appeals filed by appellants Pratik, Sudesh, Prithviraj, Munna, and Chhotu against their convictions by the Assistant ...