Search Results for "Order XXIII"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Order XXIII"

433 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 433 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Setting Aside of Compromise Decree in Partition Suit Due to Fraud and Forged Signatures. Compromise Decree Based on Forged Signatures of Defendant No.5 is a Nullity and Can Be Challenged Beyond Limitation Under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC.

1 Jan 2026

The case arises from a partition suit filed by Dinbandhu Ojha (original plaintiff) seeking 1/4th share in the property of common ancestor Thakur Ojha....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Proceedings Against Company Chairman in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Criminal Intent and Compliance with Tax Demand. Criminal Liability Under Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC Not Made Out as Differential Road Tax Was Paid Upon Demand Under Section 8A of Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957, Rendering Proceedings Abuse of Process.

14 Mar 2022

The appeal arose from an order of the Dharwad Bench of the High Court of Karnataka dismissing a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Cri...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Property Dispute Over Compromise Decree Registration. Compromise Decree Arising from Family Settlement Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Under Section 17(2)(vi) of Registration Act, 1908, as Parties Had Pre-existing Rights as Heirs.

6 Jul 2021

The dispute involved two sons of late Vijendra Singh contesting ownership of ancestral land. The appellant filed a suit for possession in 1978, disput...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Court Fee in Suit for Annulment of Compromise Decree. Court Fee Refund Granted Under Section 66(2)(a) of Karnataka Court Fee and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 When Compromise Decree Is Set Aside.

30 Jun 2021

The petitioners, L. Dayananda Reddy and Gayathri D., filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challengi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Sales Tax Reimbursement Case — Coal and Coke Held Not Same Goods Under Section 15(b) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Reimbursement of State Tax on Coal Not Available When Inter-State Sale Is of Coke, Despite Both Being Declared Goods Under Section 14.

10 May 2019

The State of Jharkhand and its officers appealed against a High Court judgment directing them to reimburse the respondent, M/s. Akash Coke Industries ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MVAT Classification Dispute — Multi Function Printers Held Classifiable as Automatic Data Processing Machines Under Entry 84.71. The Court ruled that multi function printers with copying, printing, scanning, and faxing capabilities are classifiable as automatic data processing machines or units thereof under Entry 84.71 of the VAT Notification, not as laser jet printers or under residual entry.

20 Dec 2018

The appellant, Ricoh India Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed an appeal under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 200...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Charges Against Journalists in Sting Operation Case — No Prima Facie Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Journalists posing as representatives of a company to expose corruption in public life does not constitute an offence under Section 12 of the PC Act or Sections 120-B, 114, 419 read with 34 IPC.

18 Nov 2016

The petitioners, Mahendra Mishra (Director of TV-9 Karnataka), L.R. Shrehas, and Shwetha Prabhu (news reporters), were arraigned as accused in Spl.C.C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Challenge to Compromise Decree in Suit for Specific Performance — Compromise Not Binding as Plaintiff's Advocate Had No Authority to Enter into Compromise Without Express Consent. The court held that an advocate's implied authority does not extend to compromising a suit without the client's express consent, and the trial court erred in rejecting the plaintiff's application under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC.

20 Jun 2016

The petitioner, Ashok Babulal Agrawal, was the original plaintiff in Special Civil Suit No. 29 of 2011 filed in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Divis...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Petitioner's Challenge to Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating 'Halba' Scheduled Tribe Certificate. Court Holds Committee Lacked Jurisdiction Over Pre-2000 Certificates Under Maharashtra Act XXIII of 2001.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioner, Shrirang Baburao Dhakate, was granted a Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) dealership in 1989 by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited on...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Applications for Cancellation of Bail in NDPS Case — No Supervening Circumstances or Misuse of Bail Established. The court held that cancellation of bail requires higher threshold such as interference with investigation or tampering of evidence, and mere disagreement with the trial court's order is not sufficient under Section 439(2) of CrPC.

17 Feb 2011

The Union of India filed multiple applications under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking cancellation of bail granted to si...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)