Search Results for "Maharashtra Land Revenue Code"

1338 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1338 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition Nos.4936, 6015, 6514 & 6795 of 2025 &

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Entries in Mutation Proceedings — Holds That Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Revenue Authorities Must Decide Based on Possession and Revenue Records, Not Title Disputes.

The petitioners, Navin Popatlal Shah and Nitin Sundraji Shah, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Vesting of Land as Private Forest Under Maharashtra Private Forest (Acquisition) Act, 1975. Defective Notice Under Section 35(3) and Notification Under Section 35(1) Render Vesting Invalid.

The petitioner, Rajmachi Rural Aid and Development Programme, a trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, filed a writ petition challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tribal Landowner's Petition Challenging Refusal of Prior Approval Under Section 36A of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Government Circular Cannot Override Statutory Provisions for Sale of Tribal Land.

The petitioner, Kisan Songya Bangara, a tribal agriculturist, owned land in Valshind, Thane. He sought to sell the land to respondent No. 6, a non-tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Collector's Refusal to Grant Prior Approval Under Section 36A of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code for Sale of Tribal Land. Failure to Consider Petitioner's Application on Merits and Reliance on Unrelated Government Circular Renders Impugned Orders Unsustainable.

The petitioner, Kisan Songya Bangara, a tribal agriculturist, along with his family members, owned land bearing Survey No.46/2 (12.1 Ares) and Survey ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Civil Courts. Petitioners failed to establish possession or title over suit lands; mutation entries held not conferring title under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by various petitioners challenging mutation entries made in the revenue records in favor of the origin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Mutation Entry Based on Will in Land Revenue Case — Civil Court Decree Binding on Revenue Authorities. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title and Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 227 Cannot Be Used to Reappreciate Evidence.

The petitioners, Amrutrao Shankarrao Deshmukh and Dhananjay Amrutrao Deshmukh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India ch...