Search Results for "Impleading legal representatives"

149 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 149 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Revision Petition, Sets Aside Executing Court's Order Condoning Delay in Restoration of Execution Petition. Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 Held Inapplicable to Order XXI of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Orders Beyond 30 Days.

The case involves a civil revision petition filed by the legal representatives of the deceased judgment-debtor (Padasaib) challenging an order of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds High Court's Decree for 5/9th Share but Sets Aside Sale to Third Party. Defendant No. 7's Sale of Joint Family Property to Defendant No. 9 Held Void as Purchaser Had Notice of Pending Suit.

The case pertains to a partition suit filed by Kumar Vamanrao alias Alok, Kumar Vyas alias Prateek, and Aruna (plaintiffs) against Sudheendra (defenda...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Decree-Holders' Appeals Against Executing Court's Interim Stay Order in Execution Proceedings. Held That Executing Court Cannot Stay Execution Beyond Order XXI Rule 29 CPC and Must Follow Procedure Under Order XXI Rule 37 CPC Before Arrest.

The case involves appeals by the decree-holders (appellants) against an interim order dated 29th June 2018 passed by the Principal Sub-Judge, Kottayam...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Declaration and Injunction. Court holds that the trial court erred in rejecting the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC without considering the plaintiffs' claim of possession and the pending amendment application.

The appellants, plaintiffs in Special Civil Suit No. 220/1993/A, filed a suit for declaration and injunction in 1993, claiming ownership and possessio...