High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Revocation of Probate — Will Execution Found Suspicious Due to Unnatural Circumstances and Lack of Proper Proof of Attestation Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925. The court upheld the revocation of probate granted ex parte as the propounder failed to prove due execution and remove suspicious circumstances.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 79
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, H Srinivas Rao, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, challenging the order dated 15.12.2017 passed by the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, D.K., Mangaluru, in Misc. Case No.25/2016. The Trial Court had allowed a petition under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, seeking revocation of the probate granted in favour of the appellant in P&Sc No.6/2014 dated 06.06.2015, and permitted the respondents (Niranjan Rao and others) to contest the probate petition. The background of the case involves a will allegedly executed by one Late V. Shridhar Rao, who died on 20.05.2013. The appellant, claiming to be a legatee, obtained probate ex parte on 06.06.2015. The respondents, who are the legal heirs of the deceased, filed a petition for revocation of the probate, contending that the will was not validly executed and was surrounded by suspicious circumstances. The Trial Court, after hearing the parties, allowed the revocation petition, holding that the appellant failed to prove the due execution of the will and that there were suspicious circumstances. The appellant appealed against this order. The High Court heard the appeal and reserved judgment on 21.11.2024, pronouncing it on 29.11.2024. The court analyzed the requirements of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, regarding the attestation of wills, and Section 263 regarding revocation of probate. It noted that the appellant had examined only one attesting witness, and the other attesting witness was not produced. The court also observed that the will was executed when the testator was ill and the appellant, being the propounder, was in a position to influence the execution. The court held that the Trial Court correctly found that the appellant failed to dispel the suspicious circumstances and that the probate was rightly revoked. The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Trial Court's order and allowing the respondents to contest the probate petition.

Headnote

A) Succession Law - Revocation of Probate - Section 263 Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Suspicious Circumstances - The court considered whether the probate granted ex parte should be revoked when the will was executed under circumstances that raised suspicion, including the testator being ill and the propounder being in a position to dominate the will. The Trial Court allowed revocation, and the High Court upheld it, finding that the propounder failed to dispel the suspicious circumstances. (Paras 1-20)

B) Succession Law - Attestation of Will - Section 63 Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Proof of Attestation - The court examined the requirement of proper attestation under Section 63, which mandates that the will be attested by two or more witnesses. The evidence showed that only one attesting witness was examined, and the other was not produced, leading to a failure to prove due execution. The High Court held that the Trial Court correctly revoked the probate as the will was not proved to be validly executed. (Paras 15-20)

C) Succession Law - Burden of Proof - Suspicious Circumstances - The court reiterated that when a will is surrounded by suspicious circumstances, the propounder must remove all legitimate suspicions. In this case, the propounder (appellant) failed to explain the circumstances, including the testator's illness and the active involvement of the propounder in the execution. The High Court affirmed the revocation, allowing the respondents to contest the probate petition. (Paras 10-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Trial Court was justified in revoking the probate granted in favour of the appellant under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, on the ground of suspicious circumstances surrounding the execution of the will.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Trial Court's order dated 15.12.2017 in Misc. Case No.25/2016, which revoked the probate granted in P&Sc No.6/2014 and permitted the respondents to contest the probate petition.

Law Points

  • Probate revocation
  • Section 263 Indian Succession Act
  • 1925
  • Suspicious circumstances
  • Attestation under Section 63
  • Burden of proof
  • Due execution of will
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (KAR) (12) 36

Miscellaneous First Appeal No.2317 of 2018 (ISA)

2024-11-29

H.P. Sandesh

Sri G. Balakrishna Shastry (for appellant), Sri K. Chandranath Ariga (for respondents)

H Srinivas Rao

Niranjan Rao, Smt. Pushpa N. Haldipur, Dr. Ajith Prakash, Nayan Kumar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against order revoking probate granted under Indian Succession Act.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to set aside the Trial Court's order revoking probate and to restore the probate granted in his favour.

Filing Reason

Appellant challenged the Trial Court's order allowing revocation of probate on grounds of suspicious circumstances and lack of proper attestation.

Previous Decisions

Trial Court in Misc. Case No.25/2016 allowed revocation of probate granted in P&Sc No.6/2014 dated 06.06.2015.

Issues

Whether the Trial Court was justified in revoking the probate under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925? Whether the will was executed under suspicious circumstances and whether the propounder failed to prove due execution?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the Trial Court erred in revoking the probate as the will was validly executed and attested. Respondents contended that the will was surrounded by suspicious circumstances, including the testator's illness and the propounder's active involvement, and that the attestation was not properly proved.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that when a will is surrounded by suspicious circumstances, the propounder must remove all legitimate suspicions. In this case, the appellant failed to prove due execution and attestation as required under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and the Trial Court correctly revoked the probate under Section 263.

Judgment Excerpts

This miscellaneous first appeal is filed challenging the order passed by the Trial Court in Misc. Case No.25/2016 dated 15.12.2017 wherein the Trial Court allowed the petition filed under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act and the probate granted in favour of the respondent in P&Sc No.6/2014 dated 06.06.2015 is revoked and permitted the petitioners to contest the said petition.

Procedural History

The appellant obtained probate ex parte in P&Sc No.6/2014 on 06.06.2015. The respondents filed Misc. Case No.25/2016 under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, seeking revocation of the probate. The Trial Court allowed the petition on 15.12.2017. The appellant filed the present appeal under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, challenging the order. The High Court heard the appeal and reserved judgment on 21.11.2024, pronouncing it on 29.11.2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Succession Act, 1925: 263, 384, 63
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Succession Act Case — Order Granting Succession Certificate Set Aside for Lack of Notice to All Heirs. Failure to Issue Notice to Appellant Under Section 384 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 Violates Principle...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Revocation of Probate — Will Execution Found Suspicious Due to Unnatural Circumstances and Lack of Proper Proof of Attestation Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925. The court upheld the re...