Search Results for "Grampanchayat member"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Grampanchayat member"

216 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 216 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion in Maharashtra Panchayat Raj Act Case — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 9A(2) Notice Requirements. The court held that the notice period of seven clear days must exclude the date of service and the date of meeting, and failure to provide such notice renders the no-confidence motion void.

3 May 2023

The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar Shridhar Matkar, was the Sarpanch of Khirdi Village Panchayat. A notice of no-confidence motion was issued against him und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Panchayat Samiti Member Challenging Disqualification Under Section 16(1)(k) of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. Property Tax Demand Notice Must Specify Quarterly Instalments Under Rule 8 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Taxes and Fees Rules, 1960.

22 Dec 2015

The writ petition was filed by Ashok Tukaram Dohe, a Member of Panchayat Samiti, Korapana, challenging an order of the Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Failure to Move Resolution in Special Meeting Renders Motion Invalid and Attracts Bar Under Section 35(3-A) Against Fresh Motion for One Year.

9 Nov 2023

The petitioners, Savita Shrimant Ghule (Sarpanch) and Ganesh Vishnu Hagawne (Upa-Sarpanch) of Grampanchayat Ukkadgaon, Taluka Barshi, District Solapur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Elected Sarpanch Challenging Orders Setting Aside Her Election — Estoppel by Conduct Bars Candidate Who Participated Without Objection from Challenging Election on Ground of Unauthorised Presiding Officer. The court held that a candidate who participates in an election meeting without objecting to the authority of the Presiding Officer cannot later challenge the election on that ground under Section 33(2) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

5 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Rukhmina Rajesh Dange, was elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Vyad, District Washim, on 9 August 2018, securing seven votes against...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Petition Against Removal Under Section 39 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act — Upholds Minister's Order Confirming Removal for Misappropriation of Funds. Court holds that the Sarpanch's failure to deposit collected taxes and misuse of funds constitutes 'misappropriation' under Section 39(1)(b) and that the Minister's order was based on sufficient material and not perverse.

16 Mar 2016

The Petitioner, Sau. Shubhangi Sharad Gondhali, was elected as a member of the Revdanda Grampanchayat in June 2013 and subsequently elected as Sarpanc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Sarpanch Election Due to Alternative Remedy Under Section 16 of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. Election Dispute Must Be Raised via Election Petition, Not Under Article 226.

20 Mar 2018

The petitioner, Gokul Chandanmal Sangvi, a defeated candidate in the Sarpanch election of Grampanchayat Fagne, filed a writ petition under Article 226...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch in Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act Case — State Government's Appellate Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Reasoned Order Violates Section 39(3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959.

29 Apr 2026

The Petitioner, Mangal Mahadu Korde, was elected as Sarpanch of Wakalwadi Village Panchayat in 2021. Respondent No.5, a member of the Panchayat, lodge...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Sarpanch Disqualified for Encroachment — Orders Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice. Disqualification under Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act set aside as Collector failed to provide hearing before passing order.

7 Jul 2022

The petitioner, Mahadeo s/o Bhagwat Khatawkar, was the elected Sarpanch of village Ter, Taluka and District Osmanabad. Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 filed a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No-Confidence Motion — Non-Service of Requisition Copy Not Fatal Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958. Service of Notice Under Section 35 Read with Rule 2 of No-Confidence Rules Held Sufficient Compliance.

8 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Smt. Amrapali Sakharam Kamble, was elected as Sarpanch of Mhasrang Gram Panchayat on 26th February 2021. She remained absent from meet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Sarpanch Election for Lack of Locus Standi and Alternative Remedy. Non-Voters Cannot Maintain Writ Petition Under Article 226 for Election Irregularities Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, who are residents of Bhandara district but not voters in the concerned Gram Panchayat, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the ...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)