Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Sarpanch Disqualified for Encroachment — Orders Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice. Disqualification under Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act set aside as Collector failed to provide hearing before passing order.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mahadeo s/o Bhagwat Khatawkar, was the elected Sarpanch of village Ter, Taluka and District Osmanabad. Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 filed a complaint alleging that the petitioner had encroached upon government gairan land bearing Gut No. 1273 and constructed about 700 sq. ft. (64 sq. mtr.) on it. The Collector, Osmanabad, after receiving reports from concerned authorities, passed an order on 22nd September 2018 disqualifying the petitioner from the post of Sarpanch under Section 14(1)(j-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. The petitioner appealed to the Additional Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad, who dismissed the appeal on 21st January 2019. The petitioner then filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging both orders. The main legal issue was whether the disqualification was valid when the petitioner was not given an opportunity of hearing before the Collector. The petitioner's counsel argued that the Collector passed the order without hearing the petitioner, violating principles of natural justice. The respondents' counsel argued that the petitioner had participated in the inquiry and was given sufficient opportunity. The High Court examined the record and found that the Collector's order did not mention that any opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner. The court noted that the Collector merely called for reports and passed the order without hearing the petitioner. The appellate authority also did not rectify this defect. The High Court held that the impugned orders were passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice and set them aside. The court allowed the petition, quashed the orders of the Collector and the Additional Commissioner, and restored the petitioner to the post of Sarpanch. The court also directed that the petitioner be given an opportunity of hearing if fresh proceedings are initiated.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Natural Justice - Right to Hearing - Disqualification of Sarpanch - The Collector passed an order disqualifying the petitioner under Section 14(1)(j-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act without affording him an opportunity of hearing. The High Court held that the order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice and set aside the disqualification. (Paras 5-6)

B) Local Self-Government - Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act - Section 14(1)(j-3) - Disqualification for Encroachment - The petitioner was alleged to have encroached on government gairan land. The Collector disqualified him without hearing him. The appellate authority also dismissed the appeal. The High Court found that the Collector's order was passed without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, thus violating natural justice. (Paras 3-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned orders disqualifying the petitioner from the post of Sarpanch under Section 14(1)(j-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act are sustainable in law, particularly when the petitioner was not given an opportunity of hearing before the Collector passed the disqualification order.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The impugned orders dated 22.09.2018 passed by the District Collector, Osmanabad and 21.01.2019 passed by the Additional Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad are quashed and set aside. The petitioner is restored to the post of Sarpanch. If any fresh proceedings are initiated, the petitioner shall be given an opportunity of hearing. Rule is made absolute in above terms.

Law Points

  • Natural Justice
  • Right to Hearing
  • Disqualification of Sarpanch
  • Encroachment on Government Land
  • Section 14(1)(j-3) Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (07) 14

Writ Petition No. 3032 of 2019

2022-07-07

S. G. Dige

Ms. Pradnya Talekar h/f. Talekar & Associates for Petitioner; Mr. S. S. Dande, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4; Mr. S. P. Brahme h/f. Mr. Sanket N. Suryawanshi for Respondent No. 5; Mr. R. D. Raut h/f. Mr. Akhilesh C. Tripathi for Respondent No. 6; Mr. Sanket S. Kulkarni for Respondent No. 7

Mahadeo s/o Bhagwat Khatawkar

The State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary, Rural and Water Conservation, Mantraalaya, Mumbai; The Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad; The Collector, District Osmanabad; Tahesildar, Osmanabad; Village Development Officer, Grampanchayat, Ter; Raviraj s/o Balasaheb Chougule; Padmakar s/o Bhagwanrao Fand

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging disqualification of Sarpanch under Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of orders dated 22.09.2018 passed by Collector and 21.01.2019 passed by Additional Commissioner disqualifying him from post of Sarpanch.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was disqualified without being given an opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice.

Previous Decisions

Collector disqualified petitioner on 22.09.2018; Additional Commissioner dismissed appeal on 21.01.2019.

Issues

Whether the impugned orders disqualifying the petitioner from the post of Sarpanch under Section 14(1)(j-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act are sustainable in law? Whether the petitioner was given an opportunity of hearing before the Collector passed the disqualification order?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel submitted that the Collector passed the order without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, in gross violation of principles of natural justice. Respondents' counsel argued that the petitioner participated in the inquiry and was given sufficient opportunity.

Ratio Decidendi

An order of disqualification under Section 14(1)(j-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act cannot be passed without affording the affected person an opportunity of hearing. The Collector's order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice as no hearing was given to the petitioner before passing the disqualification order.

Judgment Excerpts

The Collector passed the impugned order without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The impugned orders are passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice.

Procedural History

Complaint filed by respondent Nos. 6 and 7 against petitioner alleging encroachment on government land. Collector called reports and passed order on 22.09.2018 disqualifying petitioner. Petitioner appealed to Additional Commissioner, who dismissed appeal on 21.01.2019. Petitioner then filed writ petition before Bombay High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act: 14(1)(j-3)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Contract by Food Corporation of India Due to COVID-19 Pandemic. Non-Submission of Bank Guarantee Within Stipulated Period Held to be Force Majeure, and Debarment Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Trial Court Judgment for Lack of Reasons in Declaration and Injunction Suit — Remands for Fresh Disposal. Court finds that the Trial Court failed to discuss evidence or assign reasons on issues framed, rendering t...