Search Results for "Finance Act 2022"

1195 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1195 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944. Petitioner entitled to interest at 6% per annum from the date immediately after expiry of three months from receipt of refund application till date of refund.

The petitioner, M & G Global Services Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in providing Information Technology enabled services to its group entities located outside...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Insurance Company Tax Case — Upholds ITAT Order on Disallowance of Claims and Deductions. The court held that the assessee's method of accounting for outstanding claims and the deduction under Section 80M were correctly allowed by the Tribunal.

The case involves a batch of appeals filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai, under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses BPCL's Challenge to Service Tax on Port Storage Charges. Storage charges collected by Mumbai Port Trust from BPCL for storing petroleum products are taxable as 'port services' under Section 65(105)(zzl) of the Finance Act, 1994.

The petitioners, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) and its Territory Manager, filed a writ petition challenging the demand of Service Tax by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.

The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Section 498A IPC as Constitutionally Valid but Issues Guidelines to Prevent Misuse. The court held that the provision is not unconstitutional but requires safeguards against misuse through directions on arrest, investigation, and compounding of offences.

The Supreme Court in this batch of writ petitions and appeals considered the constitutional validity of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, w...