Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions by Financial Institutions Seeking Police Protection for Secured Asset Recovery Under SARFAESI Act — Held That Section 14 of SARFAESI Act Does Not Oust Writ Jurisdiction and That Police Authorities Must Provide Assistance for Recovery of Possession of Secured Assets.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by financial institutions seeking police protection for recovery of possession of secured assets under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act). The petitioners, L & T Finance Limited, TJSB Sahakari Bank Ltd., and The National Co-operative Bank Ltd., had initiated proceedings under the SARFAESI Act against defaulting borrowers and sought police assistance to take possession of the secured assets. The police authorities refused to provide assistance, citing lack of jurisdiction or that the remedy under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act was available. The petitioners approached the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court considered the legal issues of whether the writ jurisdiction is ousted by the availability of alternative remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, whether Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act bars police protection, and whether co-operative banks are covered under the SARFAESI Act. The court held that the existence of an alternative remedy does not oust the writ jurisdiction, especially when the petition raises questions of law. It further held that Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act does not bar the grant of police protection and that co-operative banks are covered under the SARFAESI Act by virtue of a notification. The court directed the police authorities to provide necessary assistance to the petitioners for recovery of possession of the secured assets. The judgment clarifies that financial institutions are entitled to police protection for enforcement of security interests under the SARFAESI Act.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Alternative Remedy - Availability of alternative remedy under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act does not oust the writ jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India - The court held that the existence of an alternative remedy is not an absolute bar to the maintainability of a writ petition, especially when the petition raises questions of law or involves breach of fundamental rights (Paras 10-12).

B) SARFAESI Act - Police Protection - Section 14 - Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act does not bar the grant of police protection by the High Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction - The court held that the remedy under Section 14 is not exhaustive and the High Court can direct police authorities to provide assistance for recovery of possession of secured assets (Paras 13-15).

C) SARFAESI Act - Applicability to Co-operative Banks - Co-operative banks are covered under the SARFAESI Act by virtue of notification issued under Section 2(1)(c)(v) of the SARFAESI Act - The court held that the Multi-state Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 does not bar the application of the SARFAESI Act to co-operative banks (Paras 16-18).

D) SARFAESI Act - Recovery of Possession - Police Assistance - Financial institutions are entitled to police protection for recovery of possession of secured assets under the SARFAESI Act - The court held that the police authorities are duty-bound to provide assistance to the financial institutions for recovery of possession of secured assets (Paras 19-21).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether financial institutions are entitled to police protection for recovery of possession of secured assets under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) and whether the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is ousted by the availability of alternative remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petitions and directed the police authorities to provide necessary assistance to the petitioners for recovery of possession of the secured assets.

Law Points

  • Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution of India is not ousted by availability of alternative remedy under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act
  • Section 14 of SARFAESI Act does not bar police protection
  • Financial institutions are entitled to police assistance for recovery of secured assets
  • Co-operative banks are covered under SARFAESI Act by virtue of notification under Section 2(1)(c)(v) of SARFAESI Act
  • Multi-state Co-operative Societies Act
  • 2002 does not bar application of SARFAESI Act.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (04) 53

A.S.WRIT PETITION NO. 15285 OF 2022, A.S.WRIT PETITION NO. 278 OF 2023, A.S.WRIT PETITION NO. 279 OF 2023, O.S. WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 3731 OF 2021

2023-04-27

2023:BHC-AS:12741-DB

Mr.S.S.Panchpor with Mr.S.S.Agave for the Petitioner in WP Nos.278 and 279/23, Ms.Asha Bhuta i/b. Bhuta & Associates for the Petitioner in OSWPL No.3731/22, Dr.Birendra Saraf, Advocate General with Mr.P.P.Kakade, Government Pleader with Ms.Shruti D. Vyas, B-Panel Counsel for the Respondent- State in WP Nos.15285/22 and 278 and 279/23, Mr.S.R.Nargolkar for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 in WP No.15285/2022, Mr.Himanshu Takke, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 in OSWPL No.3731/22, Mr.Graham Francis i/b. Samarth Moray for Respondent No.4 in OSWPL No.3731/22

L & T Finance Limited, TJSB Sahakari Bank Ltd., The National Co-operative Bank Ltd.

State of Maharashtra, District Collector & Dist. Magistrate, Executive Magistrate & Nayab Tehsildar, Registrar General, Mr. Dattatray Govind Jadhav, Mr. Girish Bhimrao Chavan

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions filed by financial institutions seeking police protection for recovery of possession of secured assets under the SARFAESI Act.

Remedy Sought

Direction to police authorities to provide assistance for recovery of possession of secured assets.

Filing Reason

Police authorities refused to provide assistance for recovery of possession of secured assets under the SARFAESI Act.

Issues

Whether the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is ousted by the availability of alternative remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act. Whether Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act bars the grant of police protection by the High Court. Whether co-operative banks are covered under the SARFAESI Act.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they are entitled to police protection for recovery of possession of secured assets under the SARFAESI Act and that the police authorities are duty-bound to provide assistance. Respondents argued that the petitioners have an alternative remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act and that the writ petition is not maintainable.

Ratio Decidendi

The existence of an alternative remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act does not oust the writ jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act does not bar the grant of police protection. Co-operative banks are covered under the SARFAESI Act by virtue of notification under Section 2(1)(c)(v). Financial institutions are entitled to police protection for recovery of possession of secured assets.

Judgment Excerpts

The existence of an alternative remedy is not an absolute bar to the maintainability of a writ petition. Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act does not bar the grant of police protection by the High Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction. Co-operative banks are covered under the SARFAESI Act by virtue of notification issued under Section 2(1)(c)(v) of the SARFAESI Act.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed writ petitions before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay seeking police protection for recovery of possession of secured assets under the SARFAESI Act. The court heard the petitions and delivered judgment on 27 April 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act): Section 14, Section 17, Section 2(1)(c)(v)
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • Multi-state Co-operative Societies Act, 2002:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions by Financial Institutions Seeking Police Protection for Secured Asset Recovery Under SARFAESI Act — Held That Section 14 of SARFAESI Act Does Not Oust Writ Jurisdiction and That Police Authorities Must Provid...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Partition Suit — Petitioner Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.