Search Results for "Customs Confiscation"

223 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 223 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Registration of Sale Certificate Under SARFAESI Act. Sub-Registrar Directed to Register Sale Certificate Despite Pending Civil Suit as Section 89(4) of Registration Act, 1908 Mandates Registration.

The petitioner, Sri T. Bharathgowda, purchased a property at an auction conducted by Canara Bank (respondent No.3) under the Securitisation and Recons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Orders Unsealing of Premises in Customs Investigation — Power to Search Does Not Include Power to Seal Under Section 105 of Customs Act, 1962. Sealing of Office Premises Without Express Statutory Authority Held Illegal; Respondents Permitted to Conduct Confined Search.

The petitioner, M/s. Narayan Power Solutions, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the sealing of its office premises by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Customs to Consider Reward to Informer's Widow Under Circular 20/2015 — Withholding of Reward Unjustified. The court held that the reward policy must be applied and the widow's representation must be considered within eight weeks.

The petitioner, Jayashree Chandrakant Dhavre, is the widow of a deceased informer who provided specific information to the Marine and Preventive Wing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Provisional Release of Seized Car in Customs Case Pending Adjudication. Petitioner's imported Ford Mustang GT seized on suspicion of being a 1967 model; court orders release on furnishing bond and bank guarantee under Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, Sidharth Vijay Shah, imported a 2019 RHD Ford Mustang GT Coupe sports car valued at USD 46,730, paying customs duty of Rs. 72,48,875/-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Customs Appeal, Upholds Confiscation of Cosmetics Imported Through Non-Notified Port. Import of Cosmetics Through Marmagoa Port Violates Rule 133 Read with Rule 43-A of Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945, as Cosmetics Are Not Exempted Under Rule 132 and Schedule D.

The Commissioner of Customs, Goa, filed an appeal under the Customs Act, 1962, against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Valuation Case — Sequential Application of Valuation Rules Mandatory. Rule 7 and Rule 9 of Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 Cannot Be Applied Without First Considering Rules 4 and 5 for Identical or Similar Goods.

The case involves appeals by M/s. Diyas Mantra Lighting Private Limited and its directors against orders of the Principal Commissioner of Customs (Pre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reduces Customs Penalty for Signing Documents in Good Faith — Section 112(a) Customs Act, 1962. Petitioner's limited role and lack of knowledge of illegal importation warranted reduction of penalty from Rs.7.5 lakhs to Rs.1 lakh.

The petitioner, Ashok Chhabildas, a sole proprietor of M/s A.V. Impex, challenged the order of CEGAT dated 19/1/2001 which confirmed the order-in-orig...